CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 421Community Health and DevelopmentParticipatory Visual Research MethodsEducation and Art Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment/evaluation. Using participatory action research to build healthy communities

Open access
Minkler, M.·2000·Public Health Reports
DOI 10.1093/phr/115.2.191PMC PMC1308710
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The author contends that community-based Participatory Action Research (PAR) is ideally suited for use in Healthy Communities projects. The article begins by defining PAR and its principles and characteristics, then discusses the philosophical and methodological compatibility of PAR and Healthy Communities. After highlighting the challenges of expanding the Healthy Communities accent on participation to include PAR, the article describes the experiences of two Healthy Communities projects in the US that have successfully used PAR.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/phr/115.2.191

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 421

Related

Metadata

Authors
Minkler, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Minkler, M.
ORCID
Minkler, M.
Venue
Public Health Reports
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
191-198
ISSN
  • 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2877
DOI
10.1093/phr/115.2.191
PMC
PMC1308710
OpenAlex
W1787454189
Cited by
421
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 29
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Public Health Reports (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Art Integration
Keywords
participatory action research, healthy communities, community-based participatory research, community participation, public health assessment, community health
MeSH terms
California, Community Participation, Cooperative Behavior, Health Care Coalitions, Health Promotion, Humans, United States, Washington, Community Health Planning, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review