The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The National Birth Defects Prevention Study
Open accessAbstract
The National Birth Defects Prevention Study was designed to identify infants with major birth defects and evaluate genetic and environmental factors associated with the occurrence of birth defects. The ongoing case-control study covers an annual birth population of 482,000 and includes cases identified from birth defect surveillance registries in eight states. Infants used as controls are randomly selected from birth certificates or birth hospital records. Mothers of case and control infants are interviewed and parents are asked to collect buccal cells from themselves and their infants for DNA testing. Information gathered from the interviews and the DNA specimens will be used to study independent genetic and environmental factors and gene-environment interactions for a broad range of birth defects. As of December 2000, 7470 cases and 3821 controls had been ascertained in the eight states. Interviews had been completed with 70% of the eligible case and control mothers, buccal cell collection had begun in all of the study sites, and researchers were developing analysis plans for the compiled data. This study is the largest and broadest collaborative effort ever conducted among the nation's leading birth defect researchers. The unprecedented statistical power that will result from this study will enable scientists to study the epidemiology of some rare birth defects for the first time. The compiled interview data and banked DNA of approximately 35 categories of birth defects will facilitate future research as new hypotheses and improved technologies emerge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drinking Water Nitrate and Human Health: An Updated Review
Ward, M., Jones, R., Brender, J., De Kok, T., Weyer, P., Nolan, B., Villanueva, C., & Van Breda, S. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15071557 · Cited by 1,576
Jenkins, K. J., Correa, A., Feinstein, J. A., Botto, L., Britt, A. E., Daniels, S. R., Elixson, M., Warnes, C. A., & Webb, C. L. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.183216 · Cited by 818
Use of Selective Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors in Pregnancy and the Risk of Birth Defects
Alwan, S., Reefhuis, J., Rasmussen, S. A., Olney, R. S., & Friedman, J. M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa066584 · Cited by 495
Self-citationPrepregnancy Obesity as a Risk Factor for Structural Birth Defects
Waller, D. K. (2007) · Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine · doi:10.1001/archpedi.161.8.745 · Cited by 470
Regulation of the epigenome by vitamin C
Young, J. I., Züchner, S., & Wang, G. (2015) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034228 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoon, P., Rasmussen, S., Lynberg, M., Moore, C., Anderka, M., Carmichael, S., Costa, P., Druschel, C., Hobbs, C., Romitti, P., Langlois, P., & Edmonds, L.
- Venue
- Public Health Reports®
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1_suppl
- Pages
- 32-40
- ISSN
- 0033-3549 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2877
- OpenAlex
- W2160153640
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The National Birth Defects Prevention Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/phr/116.s1.32
- The paper
- Yoon, P., Rasmussen, S., Lynberg, M., Moore, C., Anderka, M., Carmichael, S., Costa, P., Druschel, C., Hobbs, C., Romitti, P., Langlois, P., & Edmonds, L. (2001). The National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Public Health Reports®. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/116.s1.32
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.