Cited by 30Marine and fisheries researchIchthyology and Marine BiologyFish Ecology and Management Studies

Trade-offs between risks of predation and starvation in larvae make the shelf break an optimal spawning location for Atlantic bluefin tuna

Open access
Shropshire, Taylor A, Morey, Steven L, Chassignet, Eric P, Karnauskas, Mandy, Coles, Victoria J, Malca, Estrella, Laiz-Carrión, Raúl, Fiksen, Øyvind +6 more·2022·Journal of Plankton Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Atlantic bluefin tuna (ABT) (Thunnus thynnus) travel long distances to spawn in oligotrophic regions of the Gulf of Mexico (GoM) which suggests these regions offer some unique benefit to offspring survival. To better understand how larval survival varies within the GoM a spatially explicit, Lagrangian, individual-based model was developed that simulates dispersal and mortality of ABT early life stages within realistic predator and prey fields during the spawning periods from 1993 to 2012. The model estimates that starvation is the largest cumulative source of mortality associated with an early critical period. However, elevated predation on older larvae is identified as the main factor limiting survival to late postflexion. As a result, first-feeding larvae have higher survival on the shelf where food is abundant, whereas older larvae have higher survival in the open ocean with fewer predators, making the shelf break an optimal spawning area. The modeling framework developed in this study explicitly simulates both physical and biological factors that impact larval survival and hence could be used to support ecosystem based management efforts for ABT under current and future climate conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/plankt/fbab041

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For bigeye tuna, which primarily spawn in tropical regions, prey availability is more relevant than temperature to larvae.

    “In particular, for species such as bigeye tuna, which primarily spawn in tropical regions, prey availability is more relevant than temperature to larvae (Reglero et al., 2014; Shropshire et al., 2022).”

    From Impacts of phytoplankton availability on bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) recruitment in the Indian Ocean (2024) · cites this paper as Shropshire et al., 2022

    The Results (Habitat suitability; page unavailable) say declining prey biomass increased food limitation for Atlantic bluefin tuna larvae, while increased temperature had an approximately neutral effect on food limitation. This supports the prey-versus-temperature comparison for the species studied, but the paper does not establish it for bigeye tuna or describe bigeye spawning regions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bigeye tuna recruits experience exceedingly high mortality throughout the hatching and early life stages.

    “It is worth noting that the recruits experience exceedingly high mortality throughout the hatching and early life stages (Anderson, 1988; Russo et al., 2022; Shropshire et al., 2022).”

    From Impacts of phytoplankton availability on bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) recruitment in the Indian Ocean (2024) · cites this paper as Shropshire et al., 2022

    The Introduction says broadcast-spawning fish such as Atlantic bluefin tuna experience exceedingly high mortality upon hatching and throughout early life. The Results section, “Temporal variability in larval survival,” also reports very low early survival for Atlantic bluefin tuna. The paper does not establish this specifically for bigeye tuna recruits. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Tuna larvae depend on zooplankton availability after yolk sack absorption.

    “To meet their metabolic requirements, tuna larvae hinge on the zooplankton availability after the yolk sack absorption (Llopiz and Hobday, 2015; Shropshire et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Barnes, C. et al. (2010) Global patterns in predator-prey size relationships reveal size dependency of trophic transfer efficiency. Ecology, 91, 222– 232. 20380211
  2. Block, B. A. et al. (2001) Migratory movements, depth preferences, and thermal biology of Atlantic bluefin tuna. Science, 293, 1310– 1314. 11509729
  3. Fukuda, H. et al. (2014) Ontogenetic changes in schooling behaviour during larval and early juvenile stages of Pacific bluefin tuna Thunnus orientalis. Bull. Fish. Res. Agency, 76, 135– 139. 20557635
  4. Gordoa, A. and Carreras, G. (2014) Determination of temporal spawning patterns and hatching time in response to temperature of Atlantic bluefin tuna (thunnus thynnus) in the Western Mediterranean. PLoS One, 9, 30– 32. PMC3946554 24608107
  5. Laiz-Carrion, R. et al. (2015) Trophic ecology of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnusthynnus) larvae from the gulf of Mexico and nw mediterranean spawning grounds: a comparative stable isotope study. PLoS One, 10, 1– 22. PMC4574292 26375820
  6. Landry, M. R. and Swalethorp, R. (this issue) Mesozooplankton biomass, grazing and trophic structure in the bluefin tuna spawning area of the oceanic Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbab008. · DOI
  7. Morey, S. L., Martin, P. J. et al. (2003a) Export pathways for river discharged fresh water in the northern Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. C Ocean, 108, NO. C10, 3303. doi: 10.1029/2002JC001674. · DOI
  8. Morey, S. L., Schroeder, W. W. et al. (2003b) The annual cycle of riverine influence in the eastern Gulf of Mexico basin. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, NO. 16, 1867. doi: 10.1029/2003GL017348. · DOI
  9. Morey, S. L. et al. (2013) The Seasonal Variability of Continental Shelf Circulation in the Northern and Western Gulf of Mexico from a High-Resolution Numerical Model, Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico, Observations and Models, pp. 203– 218.
  10. Porch, C. E. and Lauretta, M. V. (2016) On making statistical inferences regarding the relationship between spawners and recruits and the irresolute case of western Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus). PLoS One, 11, e0156767. 27272215 PMC4896485
  11. Reglero, P. et al. (2018) Atlantic bluefin tuna spawn at suboptimal temperatures for their offspring. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 285, 20171405. PMC5784186 29321292
  12. Shiroza, A. et al. (this issue) Diet and prey selection of Atlantic Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) larvae in spawning grounds of the Gulf of Mexico. J. Plankton Res.. PMC9424712 36045950
  13. Stukel, M. R. et al. (this issue) Plankton food webs of the Gulf of Mexico spawning grounds of Atlantic Bluefin tuna. J. Plankton Res., 1– 19. PMC9424712 36045950
  14. Tilley, J. D. et al. (2016) Feeding ecology of larval Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus, from the central Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science, 92(3), 321– 334.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shropshire, T. A., Morey, S. L., Chassignet, E. P., Karnauskas, M., Coles, V. J., Malca, E., Laiz-Carrión, R., Fiksen, Ø., Reglero, P., Shiroza, A., Quintanilla Hervas, J. M., Gerard, T., Lamkin, J. T., & Stukel, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Florida State University (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Fisheries Science Center (US)
  • University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • CENTRO OCEANOGRáFICO DE MáLAGA , INSTITUTO ESPAñOL DE OCEANOGRAFíA, FUENGIROLA, Spain
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES)
Corresponding author
Shropshire, Taylor A
Venue
Journal of Plankton Research
Published
2021-06-22
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
782-798
ISSN
  • 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3774
OpenAlex
W3174741611
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Plankton Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • NOAA Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NOAA (NA20OAR4320472, NA16OAR4320199, NA15OAR4320064, NOAA-NOS-NCCOS-2017-2004875)
  • University of Miami
  • Northern Gulf Institute (18-NGI3-52, 18-NGI3-41)
  • International Educational Foundation (NA16SEC48100009)
  • NSF (1851347)
  • NASA (80NSSC17K0560)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
Thunnus thynnus, larval survival, predation risk, starvation mortality, early life stages, larval dispersal, Gulf of Mexico, ecosystem-based management, climate change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review