Cited by 42Marine Biology and Ecology ResearchMarine and coastal ecosystemsMarine and fisheries research

Summer planktonic copepod communities of Australia's North West Cape (Indian Ocean) during the 1997-99 El Nino/La Nina

McKinnon, A. D., Duggan, S., Carleton, J. H., Bottger-Schnack, R.·2008·Journal of Plankton Research

Abstract

The community composition of pelagic copepods near Australia’s North West Cape (21° 49′S, 114° 14′E) was studied during the austral summers of 1997/98 and 1998/99. Most sampling occurred at a shallow (20 m) shelf station and a deeper (90 m) shelf-break station, though on four occasions a set of eight stations were occupied on a 36 km cross-shelf transect. During the El Niño conditions prevalent during the austral summer of 1997/98, episodic upwelling occurred causing intermittent high primary production. During the El Niño conditions of 1997/98, there was a little difference between stations in the spring (October–November), but communities differentiated later in the sampling season (December–February) with a more characteristic inshore community developing at the shelf station. In the La Niña conditions of 1998/99, the community at the shelf break was invariant, but the shelf community was mainly offshore copepods as a result of seasonal downwelling during the spring that was later replaced by an inshore community of more widely distributed species. Over 120 species of copepods were identified, of which the most speciose families were the Corycaeidae (22 spp.), Oncaeidae (>20 spp.), Paracalanidae (15 spp.) and the Oithonidae (11 spp.). Cross-shelf transects confirmed the existence of a distinct inshore community of copepods, dominated by small species of Paracalanidae and Oithonidae, and which was at least twice as abundant as those at the shelf break. In both summers, ther…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/plankt/fbn043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several researchers have used copepods to characterize oceanographic conditions and water masses because their short life cycles allow them to respond to seasonal changes.

    “In recent decades, several researchers have used copepods to characterize oceanographic conditions and water masses (Björnberg, 1981;Beaugrand et al., 2002;Costello et al., 2006;McKinnon et al., 2008) because their short life cycles allow them to respond to seasonal changes (Hooff and Peterson, 2006;McKinnon et al., 2008).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKinnon, A. D., Duggan, S., Carleton, J. H., & Bottger-Schnack, R.
Affiliations
Australian Institute of Marine Science (AU)
Corresponding author
McKinnon, A. D.
Venue
Journal of Plankton Research
Published
2008-03-08
Volume
30
Issue
7
Pages
839-855
ISSN
  • 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3774
OpenAlex
W2111010575
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Plankton Research (publishedVersion)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel (GEOMAR) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
Keywords
planktonic copepods, copepod community composition, El Niño, La Niña, North West Cape, shelf break, cross-shelf transect, inshore-offshore gradient, Paracalanidae, Oithonidae, Oncaeidae, primary production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review