Temporal and alongshore distribution of decapod larvae in the oceanic island of Gran Canaria (NW Africa)
Abstract
Larval transport strongly influences neritic populations of oceanic islands. We investigated the spatial-temporal variability of the assemblage of decapod larvae at the shelf edge off Gran Canaria Island. Environmental and planktonic monitoring were conducted weekly from January to July 2001, at three stations located at different positions in relation to the Trade winds and Canary Current. A total of 5969 decapod larvae of 112 different taxa were recorded. Temporal distribution of decapod larvae abundance displayed two main peaks: the first one took place during February–March associated with the mesozooplankton increase and the second in June–July related to a rise in temperature. The spatial distribution of larvae had a windward–leeward pattern. Larval abundances were much higher in the area of the weak flow around the stagnation point upstream of the island and the warm lee region downstream and were dominated by the benthic species: Galathea intermedia, Philocheras bispinosus, Anapagurus spp., Nanocassiope melanodactyla and Xantho spp. In contrast, on the flank of the island where the current and winds increase, abundances decreased notably with a higher contribution of holopelagic species, such as Gennadas spp. and Deosergestes henseni, suggesting a greater influence of the open ocean waters. Oceanographic conditions related to the island mass effect seems to control the retention zones for decapod larvae. The stagnation point and the lee of the island clearly favour th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For many fish species, the greatest risk from climate change may operate during larval and/or juvenile stages, when survival and recruitment are strongly dependent on having sufficient planktonic food resources at the right time and place.
“For many fish species, the greatest risk from climate change may operate during larval and/or juvenile stages, when survival and recruitment are strongly dependent on having sufficient planktonic food resources at the right time and place [23][24][25][26][27].”
From Anticipated Effects of Climate Change on Coastal Upwelling Ecosystems (2015) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anticipated Effects of Climate Change on Coastal Upwelling Ecosystems
Bakun, A., Black, B. A., Bograd, S. J., García-Reyes, M., Miller, A. J., Rykaczewski, R. R., & Sydeman, W. J. (2015) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-015-0008-4 · Cited by 470 · see citing works
- Authors
- Landeira, J. M., Lozano-Soldevilla, F., & Hernández-León, S.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Plankton Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-14
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 309-322
- ISSN
- 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2115692451
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Plankton Research (publishedVersion)
- Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
- Keywords
- decapod larvae, larval transport, oceanic islands, Gran Canaria, Canary Current, trade winds, island mass effect, stagnation point, mesozooplankton, self-recruitment, Galathea intermedia, Philocheras bispinosus, marine protected areas, shelf break
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review