Cited by 16Crustacean biology and ecologyMarine Biology and Ecology ResearchCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies

Temporal and alongshore distribution of decapod larvae in the oceanic island of Gran Canaria (NW Africa)

Landeira, Jose Maria, Lozano-Soldevilla, Fernando, Hernández-León, Santiago·2013·Journal of Plankton Research

Abstract

Larval transport strongly influences neritic populations of oceanic islands. We investigated the spatial-temporal variability of the assemblage of decapod larvae at the shelf edge off Gran Canaria Island. Environmental and planktonic monitoring were conducted weekly from January to July 2001, at three stations located at different positions in relation to the Trade winds and Canary Current. A total of 5969 decapod larvae of 112 different taxa were recorded. Temporal distribution of decapod larvae abundance displayed two main peaks: the first one took place during February–March associated with the mesozooplankton increase and the second in June–July related to a rise in temperature. The spatial distribution of larvae had a windward–leeward pattern. Larval abundances were much higher in the area of the weak flow around the stagnation point upstream of the island and the warm lee region downstream and were dominated by the benthic species: Galathea intermedia, Philocheras bispinosus, Anapagurus spp., Nanocassiope melanodactyla and Xantho spp. In contrast, on the flank of the island where the current and winds increase, abundances decreased notably with a higher contribution of holopelagic species, such as Gennadas spp. and Deosergestes henseni, suggesting a greater influence of the open ocean waters. Oceanographic conditions related to the island mass effect seems to control the retention zones for decapod larvae. The stagnation point and the lee of the island clearly favour th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/plankt/fbs089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For many fish species, the greatest risk from climate change may operate during larval and/or juvenile stages, when survival and recruitment are strongly dependent on having sufficient planktonic food resources at the right time and place.

    “For many fish species, the greatest risk from climate change may operate during larval and/or juvenile stages, when survival and recruitment are strongly dependent on having sufficient planktonic food resources at the right time and place [23][24][25][26][27].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landeira, J. M., Lozano-Soldevilla, F., & Hernández-León, S.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Venue
Journal of Plankton Research
Published
2012-12-14
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
309-322
ISSN
  • 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3774
OpenAlex
W2115692451
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Plankton Research (publishedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Keywords
decapod larvae, larval transport, oceanic islands, Gran Canaria, Canary Current, trade winds, island mass effect, stagnation point, mesozooplankton, self-recruitment, Galathea intermedia, Philocheras bispinosus, marine protected areas, shelf break

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review