The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microzooplankton grazing in the oceans: impacts, data variability, knowledge gaps and future directions
Abstract
Here we review all published data on phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing using the dilution technique to better understand the role of this group of grazers in different regions of the oceans, and to identify the knowledge gaps that require future efforts. A total of 1525 data points assimilated from 110 studies were included and grouped using the biogeographic subsets defined by Longhurst et al. [(1995) An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J. Plankton Res., 17, 1245–1271]. Total median phytoplankton growth rates in each of the subsets varied between 0.15 (Polar Southern) and 0.83 day−1 (Trades Atlantic), with the corresponding microzooplankton grazing rates ranging between 0.07 (Polar Southern) and 0.48 day−1 (Trades Indian). The median percentage of primary production (PP) grazed by microzooplankton was relatively constant among the regions and ranged from 49 to 77%, with the lowest percentage found in the Westerlies Southern and the highest in the Coastal Indian. Despite strong evidence that microzooplankton grazing impacts were highly variable, no global drivers for this variability (temperature, chlorophyll concentration) were identified in the analysis. As a global carbon budget, the overall consumption of phytoplankton for all regions was 31.3 Gt C year−1, which accounted for 62.4% of the total PP grazed daily. The amount of carbon ingested by micro- and mesozooplankton varied proportionally to the PP and the consumption was five times higher for micro- than for mesozooplankton. As concluding remarks of the study, we present some suggestions that may improve the quality of the data obtained with the dilution technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marine viruses — major players in the global ecosystem
Suttle, C. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1750 · Cited by 3,157
Biogeochemical Controls and Feedbacks on Ocean Primary Production
Falkowski, P. G., Barber, R. T., & Smetacek, V. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5374.200 · Cited by 2,848
Cushing, D. H. (1990) · Advances in Marine Biology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2881(08)60202-3 · Cited by 2,098
An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data
Longhurst, A., Sathyendranath, S., Platt, T., & Caverhill, C. (1995) · Journal of Plankton Research · doi:10.1093/plankt/17.6.1245 · Cited by 1,480
Viruses and Nutrient Cycles in the Sea
Wilhelm, S. W., & Suttle, C. A. (1999) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313569 · Cited by 1,263
Estimating the grazing impact of marine micro-zooplankton
Landry, M. R., & Hassett, R. P. (1982) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00397668 · Cited by 1,216
Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine systems
Calbet, A., & Landry, M. R. (2004) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.2004.49.1.0051 · Cited by 1,206
Self-citationSignificance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs
Sherr, E. B., & Sherr, B. F. (2002) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1020591307260 · Cited by 909
Respiration rates in bacteria exceed phytoplankton production in unproductive aquatic systems
del Giorgio, P. A., Cole, J. J., & Cimbleris, A. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385148a0 · Cited by 705
Kiørboe, T., Møhlenberg, F., & Hamburger, K. (1985) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps026085 · Cited by 649
Cited by
Cell Size as a Key Determinant of Phytoplankton Metabolism and Community Structure
Marañón, E. (2015) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015955 · Cited by 514
African desert dust influences migrations and fisheries of the Atlantic skipjack-tuna
Rodríguez, S., Riera, R., Fonteneau, A., Alonso-Pérez, S., & López-Darias, J. (2023) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120022 · Cited by 23
“The resulting new organic matter feeds the micro-and meso-zooplankton communities, which consume 12 – 35% of new primary production (Schmoker et al., 2013), redistributing the organic matter flow between faecal pellets -which directly contribute to the biological pump-and higher trophic levels…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmoker, C., Hernández-León, S., & Calbet, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Plankton Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-03-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 691-706
- ISSN
- 0142-7873 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3774
- OpenAlex
- W2104585544
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 12.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microzooplankton grazing in the oceans: impacts, data variability, knowledge gaps and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/plankt/fbt023
- The paper
- Schmoker, C., Hernández-León, S., & Calbet, A. (2013). Microzooplankton grazing in the oceans: impacts, data variability, knowledge gaps and future directions. Journal of Plankton Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbt023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.