The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work–life balance and labor markets
Open accessAbstract
The coronavirus pandemic has interrupted labor markets, triggering massive and instant series of experimentations with flexible work arrangements, and new relationships to centralized working environments. These approaches have laid the basis for the “new normal,” likely extending into the organization of work in the post-pandemic era. These new arrangements, especially flexible work arrangements, have challenged traditional relationships with employees and employers, work time and working hours, the work–life balance (WLB), and the relationship of individuals to work. This paper investigates how labor markets have been interrupted due to the pandemic, focusing especially on manual (blue-collar) and nonmanual (white-collar) work and the future of the WLB, along with exploring the projected deviations that are driving a foreseeable future policy revolution in work and employment. This paper argues that although hybrid and remote working would be more popular in the post-pandemic for nonmanual work, it will not be “one size fits all” solution. Traditional work practices will remain, and offices will not completely disappear. Manual labor will continue current work practices with increased demands. Employers’ attention to employees’ WLB in the new normal will target employees’ motivation and achieving better WLB. These trends for the labor market and WLB are classified into three categories—those that are predicated on changes that were already underway but were accelerated with arrival of the pandemic (“acceleration”); those that represent normalization of what were once considered avant-garde ways of work (“normalization”); and those that represent modification or alteration of pre-pandemic set-up (“remodelling”).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How many jobs can be done at home?
Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235 · Cited by 2,055
Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju032 · Cited by 1,991
COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.
Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., et al. (2021) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000716 · Cited by 1,712
Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., & Spurgeon, P. C. (2013) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-08-2012-0059 · Cited by 559
Digital technology use during COVID ‐19 pandemic: A rapid review
Vargo, D., Zhu, L., Benwell, B., & Yan, Z. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.242 · Cited by 459
Palumbo, R. (2020) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-06-2020-0150 · Cited by 446
Coronavirus (covid-19) and entrepreneurship: changing life and work landscape
Ratten, V. (2020) · Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1080/08276331.2020.1790167 · Cited by 428
Vyas, L., & Butakhieo, N. (2020) · Policy Design and Practice · doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1863560 · Cited by 413
Self-citationForman, C., & van Zeebroeck, N. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.021 · Cited by 305
Construction and initial validation of the E-Work Life Scale to measure remote e-working
Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., Spurgeon, P. C., Tramontano, C., & Charalampous, M. (2019) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-09-2017-0229 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Sustainable HRM and well-being: systematic review and future research agenda
Qamar, F., Afshan, G., & Rana, S. A. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00360-6 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Vyas, L.
- Venue
- Policy and Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2022-01-20
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-167
- ISSN
- 1449-4035 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-3373
- OpenAlex
- W4205169348
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 102.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work–life balance and labor markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/polsoc/puab011
- The paper
- Vyas, L. (2022). “New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work–life balance and labor markets. Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puab011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.