RESOLUTE CONCILIATIONISM
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We lack a compelling reason not to reject conciliationism.
“Therefore, we also lack a compelling reason not to reject conciliationism.29”
From Conciliationism as Epistemic Concession in Religious Peer Disagreement (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conciliationism as Epistemic Concession in Religious Peer Disagreement
Aslantatar, N. (2025) · İlahiyat Tetkikleri Dergisi · doi:10.29288/ilted.1657637 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pittard, J.
- Corresponding author
- Pittard, John
- ORCID
- Pittard, John
- Venue
- The Philosophical Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-03-11
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 260
- Pages
- 442-463
- ISSN
- 0031-8094 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9213
- OpenAlex
- W4240661214
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 31 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Philosophical Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- religious pluralism, religious tolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
