Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mutational analysis of the interaction between staphylococcal protein A and human IgG1

Cedergren, Lena, Andersson, Roland, Jansson, Birger, Uhlén, Mathias, Nilsson, Björn·1993·"Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"

Abstract

The interactions have been studied between an IgG-binding domain derivative based on domain B of staphylococcal protein A (designated Z) and human immunoglobulin G class 1 (IgG1) and its Fc fragment (Fc1) respectively. Five single amino acid substituted mutant forms of Z were constructed at the gene level, produced intracellularly in Escherichia coli, purified to homogeneity and characterized. Four of these Z variants, designated Z(L17D), Z(N28A), Z(I31A) and Z(K35A), were mutated in residues suggested to be involved in binding, based on the three-dimensional structure of the complex between a one domain protein A molecule and Fc1 [Deisenhofer, J. (1981) Biochemistry, 20, 2361-2370]. The fifth mutant protein, Z(F30A), had a mutation in a phenylalanine residue which was not expected to be involved in the interaction. Analysis by far UV circular dichroism spectroscopy suggests that all Z mutant proteins have similar folds. Their respective binding to human monoclonal IgG1 and to human recombinant Fc1 were studied in a competitive binding assay using radioactively labeled Z as a tracer, demonstrating that the mutant proteins with a substitution in the postulated binding surface showed a weakened binding to both the full-length antibody and the recombinant Fc1. The affinity constants of the interactions as well as relative binding free energies from the parent Z molecule were calculated. These values were similar for each Z variant to both IgG1 and Fc1, suggesting that Fc and not Fab binding was measured also for IgG1. However, the binding strengths differ significantly, and these binding properties were used to compare the contribution of each mutated amino acid residue in the Fc interaction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/6.4.441

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Cedergren, L., Andersson, R., Jansson, B., Uhlén, M., & Nilsson, B.
Venue
"Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
Published
1993
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
441-448
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2167762619
Cited by
159
References
0
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mutational analysis of the interaction between staphylococcal protein A and human IgG1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/6.4.441
The paper
Cedergren, L., Andersson, R., Jansson, B., Uhlén, M., & Nilsson, B. (1993). Mutational analysis of the interaction between staphylococcal protein A and human IgG1. "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection". https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/6.4.441

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.