Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minimizing a binding domain from protein A.

Open access
Braisted, A C, Wells, J A·1996·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We present a systematic approach to minimizing the Z-domain of protein A, a three-helix bundle (59 residues total) that binds tightly (Kd = 10 nM) to the Fc portion of an immunoglobin IgG1. Despite the fact that all the contacts seen in the x-ray structure of the complex with the IgG are derived from residues in the first two helices, when helix 3 is deleted, binding affinity is reduced > 10(5)-fold (Kd > 1 mM). By using structure-based design and phage display methods, we have iteratively improved the stability and binding affinity for a two-helix derivative, 33 residues in length, such that it binds IgG1, with a Kd of 43 nM. This was accomplished by stepwise selection of random mutations from three regions of the truncated Z-peptide: the 4 hydrophobic residues from helix 1 and helix 2 that contacted helix 3 (the exoface), followed by 5 residues between helix 1 and helix 2 (the intraface), and lastly by 19 residues at or near the interface that interacts with Fc (the interface). As selected mutations from each region were compiled (12 in total), they led to progressive increases in affinity for IgG, and concomitant increases in alpha-helical content reflecting increased stabilization of the two-helix scaffold. Thus, by sequential increases in the stability of the structure and improvements in the quality of the intermolecular contacts, one can reduce larger binding domains to smaller ones. Such mini-protein binding domains are more amenable to synthetic chemistry and thus may be useful starting points for the design of smaller organic mimics. Smaller binding motifs also provide simplified and more tractable models for understanding determinants of protein function and stability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5688

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 302

Metadata

Authors
Braisted, A. C., & Wells, J. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1996-06-11
Volume
93
Issue
12
Pages
5688-5692
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2049848125
Cited by
302
References
15
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimizing a binding domain from protein A. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.93.12.5688
The paper
Braisted, A. C., & Wells, J. A. (1996). Minimizing a binding domain from protein A. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.12.5688

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.