The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking
Abstract
We have added a chemical filter to the ligand placement algorithm of the molecular docking program DOCK. DOCK places ligands in receptors using local shape features. Here we label these shape features by chemical type and insist on complementary matches. We find fewer physically unrealistic complexes without reducing the number of complexes resembling the known ligand-receptor configurations. Approximately 10-fold fewer complexes are calculated and the new algorithm is correspondingly 10-fold faster than the previous shape-only matching. We tested the new algorithm's ability to reproduce three known ligand-receptor complexes: methotrexate in dihydrofolate reductase, deoxyuridine monophosphate in thymidylate synthase and pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in trypsin. The program found configurations within 1 A of the crystallographic mode, with fewer non-native solutions compared with shape-only matching. We also tested the program's ability to retrieve known inhibitors of thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase by screening molecular databases against the enzyme structures. Both algorithms retrieved many known inhibitors preferentially to other compounds in the database. The chemical matching algorithm generally ranks known inhibitors better than does matching based on shape alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.
Huang, N., Shoichet, B. K., & Irwin, J. J. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0608356 · Cited by 1,318
Self-citationWalters, W. P., Stahl, M. T., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(97)01163-x · Cited by 991
Charifson, P. S., Corkery, J. J., Murcko, M. A., & Walters, W. P. (1999) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm990352k · Cited by 698
Doman, T. N., McGovern, S. L., Witherbee, B. J., Kasten, T. P., Kurumbail, R., Stallings, W. C., Connolly, D. T., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm010548w · Cited by 462
Self-citationMcGovern, S. L., & Shoichet, B. K. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0300330 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shoichet, B. K., & Kuntz, I. D.
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 723-732
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2027640169
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/6.7.723
- The paper
- Shoichet, B. K., & Kuntz, I. D. (1993). Matching chemistry and shape in molecular docking. "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection". https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/6.7.723
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.