Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations?
Abstract
A method has been developed to detect pairs of positions with correlated mutations in protein multiple sequence alignments. The method is based on reconstruction of the phylogenetic tree for a set of sequences and statistical analysis of the distribution of mutations in the branches of the tree. The database of homology-derived protein structures (HSSP) is used as the source of multiple sequence alignments for proteins of known three-dimensional structure. We analyse pairs of positions with correlated mutations in 67 protein families and show quantitatively that the presence of such positions is a typical feature of protein families. A significant but weak tendency is observed for correlated residue pairs to be close in the three-dimensional structure. With further improvements, methods of this type may be useful for the prediction of residue--residue contacts and subsequent prediction of protein structure using distance geometry algorithms. In conclusion, we suggest a new experimental approach to protein structure determination in which selection of functional mutants after random mutagenesis and analysis of correlated mutations provide sufficient proximity constraints for calculation of the protein fold.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One of the major insights leveraged by AlphaFold comes from the use of evolutionary covariations that can be extracted from large-scale multiple sequence alignments.
“One of the major insights leveraged by AlphaFold 1,2 comes from the use of evolutionary covariations that can be extracted from large-scale multiple sequence alignments.[49][50][51][52][53][54]”
From AlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins (2021) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
Self-citationProtein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation
Marks, D. S., Colwell, L. J., Sheridan, R., Hopf, T. A., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · Cited by 1,144 · see citing works
Self-citationCorrelated mutations and residue contacts in proteins
Göbel, U., Sander, C., Schneider, R., & Valencia, A. (1994) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340180402 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Self-citationAlphaFold and Implications for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Ruff, K. M., & Pappu, R. V. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167208 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Emerging methods in protein co-evolution
de Juan, D., Pazos, F., & Valencia, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3414 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co‐evolution and deep learning coming of age
Schaarschmidt, J., Monastyrskyy, B., Kryshtafovych, A., & Bonvin, A. M. J. J. (2018) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25407 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Correlated mutations in models of protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects
Lapedes, A. S., Giraud, B., Liu, L., & Stormo, G. D. (1999) · Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes - Monograph Series · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215455556 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Deep learning in biomedical data science
Baldi, P. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013343 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Li, Y., Zhang, C., Bell, E. W., Yu, D., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25798 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Molecular replacement: tricks and treats
Abergel, C. (2013) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0907444913015291 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shindyalov, I. N., Kolchanov, N. A., & Sander, C.
- Affiliations
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory (DE)
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 349-358
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2033806446
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Keywords
- correlated mutations, residue-residue contacts, protein structure prediction, phylogenetic inference, multiple sequence alignment, protein families, distance geometry, random mutagenesis
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Amino Acids, Chemistry, Physical, Cytochrome c Group, DNA-Binding Proteins, Biological Evolution, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Proteins, Repressor Proteins, Trypsin, Viral Proteins, Molecular Structure, Mutagenesis, Sequence Alignment, Protein Structure, Secondary, Viral Regulatory and Accessory Proteins, Chemical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review