The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Protein docking for low-resolution structures
Abstract
A typical problem for a docking procedure is how to match two molecules with known 3-D structure so as to predict the configuration of their complex. A very serious obstacle to docking is an inherent inaccuracy in the 3-D structures of the molecules. In general, existing molecular recognition techniques are not designed for cases where (i) conformational changes upon macromolecular complex formation are substantial or (ii) the X-ray data on one or both (macro) molecules are not available, and the structures, based on alternative sources (NMR, modeling), are not well defined. We designed a direct computer experiment using molecules totally deprived of any structural features smaller than 7 A. This was performed on the basis of a previously developed docking algorithm. The modified procedure was applied to a number of known protein complexes taken from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank. In most cases, a pronounced trend towards the correct structure of the molecular complex was clearly indicated and the real binding sites were predicted. The distinction between the prediction of the antigen-antibody complex and other molecular pairs may reflect important differences in the principles of complex formation. The results strongly suggest the use of our recognition procedure for docking studies where the detailed structures of the molecules are lacking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
PatchDock and SymmDock: servers for rigid and symmetric docking
Schneidman-Duhovny, D., Inbar, Y., Nussinov, R., & Wolfson, H. J. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki481 · Cited by 3,018
Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions
Halperin, I., Ma, B., Wolfson, H., & Nussinov, R. (2002) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.10115 · Cited by 1,294
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“…modeling substrate specificity (Xu et al., 1996); in predicting antigenic epitopes (Sali and Blundell, 1993); in simulating protein-protein docking (Vakser, 1995); in inferring function from calculated electrostatic potential around the protein (Matsumoto et al., 1995); in facilitating molecular…”
BackgroundProtein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Vakser, I. A. (2014) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.033 · Cited by 318
Self-citationBiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions
Palma, P. N., Krippahl, L., Wampler, J. E., & Moura, J. J. G. (2000) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(20000601)39:4<372::aid-prot100>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Vakser, I. A.
- Venue
- "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection"
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-378
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2000464453
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein docking for low-resolution structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/8.4.371
- The paper
- Vakser, I. A. (1995). Protein docking for low-resolution structures. "Protein Engineering, Design and Selection". https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/8.4.371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.