Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment

Open access
McDonagh, C. F., Turcott, E., Westendorf, L., Webster, J. B., Alley, S. C., Kim, K., Andreyka, J., Stone, I., Hamblett, K. J., Francisco, J. A., Carter, P.·2006·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

The chimeric anti-CD30 IgG1, cAC10, conjugated to eight equivalents of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) was previously shown to have potent antitumor activity against CD30-expressing tumors xenografts in mice. Moreover, the therapeutic index was increased by lowering the stoichiometry from 8 drugs/antibody down to 2 or 4. Limitations of such 'partially-loaded' conjugates are low yield (10-30%) as they are purified from mixtures with variable stoichiometry (0-8 drugs/antibody), and heterogeneity as the 2 or 4 drugs are distributed over eight possible cysteine conjugation sites. Here, the solvent-accessible cysteines that form the interchain disulfide bonds in cAC10 were replaced with serine, to reduce the eight potential conjugation sites down to 4 or 2. These Cys-->Ser antibody variants were conjugated to MMAE in near quantitative yield (89-96%) with defined stoichiometries (2 or 4 drugs/antibody) and sites of drug attachment. The engineered antibody-drug conjugates have comparable antigen-binding affinities and in vitro cytotoxic activities with corresponding purified parental antibody-drug conjugates. Additionally, the engineered and parental antibody-drug conjugates have similar in vivo properties including antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose. Our strategy for generating antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug loading is potentially broadly applicable to other antibodies as it involves engineering of constant domains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/gzl013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
McDonagh, C. F., Turcott, E., Westendorf, L., Webster, J. B., Alley, S. C., Kim, K., Andreyka, J., Stone, I., Hamblett, K. J., Francisco, J. A., & Carter, P.
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
2006-04-18
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
299-307
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2124532648
Cited by
243
References
0
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/gzl013
The paper
McDonagh, C. F., Turcott, E., Westendorf, L., Webster, J. B., Alley, S. C., Kim, K., Andreyka, J., Stone, I., Hamblett, K. J., Francisco, J. A., & Carter, P. (2006). Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzl013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.