The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment
Open accessAbstract
The chimeric anti-CD30 IgG1, cAC10, conjugated to eight equivalents of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) was previously shown to have potent antitumor activity against CD30-expressing tumors xenografts in mice. Moreover, the therapeutic index was increased by lowering the stoichiometry from 8 drugs/antibody down to 2 or 4. Limitations of such 'partially-loaded' conjugates are low yield (10-30%) as they are purified from mixtures with variable stoichiometry (0-8 drugs/antibody), and heterogeneity as the 2 or 4 drugs are distributed over eight possible cysteine conjugation sites. Here, the solvent-accessible cysteines that form the interchain disulfide bonds in cAC10 were replaced with serine, to reduce the eight potential conjugation sites down to 4 or 2. These Cys-->Ser antibody variants were conjugated to MMAE in near quantitative yield (89-96%) with defined stoichiometries (2 or 4 drugs/antibody) and sites of drug attachment. The engineered antibody-drug conjugates have comparable antigen-binding affinities and in vitro cytotoxic activities with corresponding purified parental antibody-drug conjugates. Additionally, the engineered and parental antibody-drug conjugates have similar in vivo properties including antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and maximum tolerated dose. Our strategy for generating antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug loading is potentially broadly applicable to other antibodies as it involves engineering of constant domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates
Beck, A., Goetsch, L., Dumontet, C., & Corvaïa, N. (2017) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.268 · Cited by 2,271
Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index
Junutula, J. R., Raab, H., Clark, S., Bhakta, S., Leipold, D. D., Weir, S., Chen, Y., Simpson, M., Tsai, S. P., Dennis, M. S., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1480 · Cited by 1,382
Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) for Relapsed CD30-Positive Lymphomas
Younes, A., Bartlett, N. L., Leonard, J. P., Kennedy, D. A., Lynch, C. M., Sievers, E. L., & Forero-Torres, A. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1002965 · Cited by 1,368
Nanogels: An overview of properties, biomedical applications and obstacles to clinical translation
Soni, K. S., Desale, S. S., & Bronich, T. K. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.11.009 · Cited by 683
Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy
Panowski, S., Bhakta, S., Raab, H., Polakis, P., & Junutula, J. R. (2014) · mAbs · doi:10.4161/mabs.27022 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonagh, C. F., Turcott, E., Westendorf, L., Webster, J. B., Alley, S. C., Kim, K., Andreyka, J., Stone, I., Hamblett, K. J., Francisco, J. A., & Carter, P.
- Venue
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 299-307
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2124532648
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/gzl013
- The paper
- McDonagh, C. F., Turcott, E., Westendorf, L., Webster, J. B., Alley, S. C., Kim, K., Andreyka, J., Stone, I., Hamblett, K. J., Francisco, J. A., & Carter, P. (2006). Engineered antibody-drug conjugates with defined sites and stoichiometries of drug attachment. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzl013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.