The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Trp-cage: optimizing the stability of a globular miniprotein
Open accessAbstract
The Trp-cage, as the smallest miniprotein, remains the subject of numerous computational and experimental studies of protein folding dynamics and pathways. The original Trp-cage (NLYIQWLKDGGPSSGRPPPS, Tm = 42 degrees C) can be significantly stabilized by mutations; melting points as high as 64 degrees C are reported. In helical portions of the structure, each allowed replacement of Leu, Ile, Lys or Ser residues by Ala results in a 1.5 (+/-0.35) kJ/mol fold stabilization. No changes in structure or fluxionality of the core results upon stabilization. Contrary to the initial hypothesis, specific Pro/Trp interactions are not essential for core formation. The entropic advantage of Pro versus Ala (DeltaDeltaS(U) = 11 +/- 2 J/mol K) was measured at the solvent-exposed P17 site. Pro-Ala mutations at two of the three prolines (P12 and P18) that encage the indole ring result in less fold destabilization (2.3-3.4 kJ/mol). However, a P19A mutation reduces fold stability by 16 kJ/mol reflecting a favorable Y3/P19 interaction as well as Trp burial. The Y3/P19 hydrophobic staple interaction defines the folding motif as an 18-residue unit. Other stabilizing features that have been identified include a solvent-exposed Arg/Asp salt bridge (3.4-6 kJ/mol) and a buried H-bonded Ser side chain ( approximately 10 kJ/mol).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Designing a 20-residue protein
Neidigh, J. W., Fesinmeyer, R. M., & Andersen, N. H. (2002) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb798 · Cited by 793
Self-citation
Cited by
How fast-folding proteins fold
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208351 · Cited by 1,980
Improved Reweighting of Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Free Energy Calculation
Miao, Y., Sinko, W., Pierce, L., Bucher, D., Walker, R. C., & McCammon, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct500090q · Cited by 455
Accelerated molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding
Miao, Y., Feixas, F., Eun, C., & McCammon, J. A. (2015) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.23964 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Barua, B., Lin, J. C., Williams, V. D., Kummler, P., Neidigh, J. W., & Andersen, N. H.
- Venue
- Protein Engineering Design and Selection
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-01-18
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-185
- ISSN
- 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-0126
- 1741-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2107851313
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Trp-cage: optimizing the stability of a globular miniprotein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/protein/gzm082
- The paper
- Barua, B., Lin, J. C., Williams, V. D., Kummler, P., Neidigh, J. W., & Andersen, N. H. (2008). The Trp-cage: optimizing the stability of a globular miniprotein. Protein Engineering Design and Selection. https://doi.org/10.1093/protein/gzm082
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.