Cited by 536Machine Learning in BioinformaticsProtein Structure and DynamicsLipid Membrane Structure and Behavior

CSS-Palm 2.0: an updated software for palmitoylation sites prediction

Open access
Ren, J., Wen, L., Gao, X., Jin, C., Xue, Y., Yao, X.·2008·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

Protein palmitoylation is an essential post-translational lipid modification of proteins, and reversibly orchestrates a variety of cellular processes. Identification of palmitoylated proteins with their sites is the foundation for understanding molecular mechanisms and regulatory roles of palmitoylation. Contrasting to the labor-intensive and time-consuming experimental approaches, in silico prediction of palmitoylation sites has attracted much attention as a popular strategy. In this work, we updated our previous CSS-Palm into version 2.0. An updated clustering and scoring strategy (CSS) algorithm was employed with great improvement. The leave-one-out validation and 4-, 6-, 8- and 10-fold cross-validations were adopted to evaluate the prediction performance of CSS-Palm 2.0. Also, an additional new data set not included in training was used to test the robustness of CSS-Palm 2.0. By comparison, the performance of CSS-Palm was much better than previous tools. As an application, we performed a small-scale annotation of palmitoylated proteins in budding yeast. The online service and local packages of CSS-Palm 2.0 were freely available at: http://bioinformatics.lcd-ustc.org/css_palm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/gzn039

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GPS-Lipid predicted potential modification positions in the S. salmonicida annexins.

    “We employed the GPS-Lipid tool (http://lipid.biocuckoo.org/) (22) to predict potential modification positions in the annexins (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ren, J., Wen, L., Gao, X., Jin, C., Xue, Y., & Yao, X.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xue, Y.
  • Yao, X.
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
2008-08-27
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
639-644
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2160678789
Cited by
536
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 31
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
Keywords
palmitoylation, post-translational lipid modification, prediction performance evaluation, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, web-based prediction tool
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Computer Simulation, Saccharomycetales, Models, Molecular, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Proteins, Software, Cluster Analysis, Lipoylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review