Cited by 116Biochemical and Structural CharacterizationClick Chemistry and ApplicationsCRISPR and Genetic Engineering

Nature's recipe for splitting inteins

Open access
Aranko, A. S., Wlodawer, A., Iwai, H.·2014·Protein Engineering Design and Selection

Abstract

Protein splicing in trans by split inteins has increasingly become a powerful protein-engineering tool for protein ligation, both in vivo and in vitro. Over 100 naturally occurring and artificially engineered split inteins have been reported for protein ligation using protein trans-splicing. Here, we review the current status of the reported split inteins in order to delineate an empirical or rational strategy for constructing new split inteins suitable for various applications in biotechnology and chemical biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/protein/gzu028

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Derbyshire,V., Wood,D.W., Wu,W., Dansereau,J.T., Dalgaard,J.Z. and Belfort,M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94, 11466-11471.
  2. Lockless,S.W. and Muir,T.W. (2009) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 10999-11004.
  3. Mills,K.V., Lew,B.M., Jiang,S. and Paulus,H. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 3543-3548.
  4. Wu,H., Hu,Z. and Liu,X.Q. (1998a) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 9226-9231.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aranko, A. S., Wlodawer, A., & Iwai, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
Protein Engineering Design and Selection
Published
2014-08-01
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
263-271
ISSN
  • 0269-2139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0126
  • 1741-0134
OpenAlex
W2056881013
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Protein Engineering Design and Selection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland (137995)
  • Biocenter Finland
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Keywords
split intein, protein trans-splicing, protein ligation, protein engineering, chemical biology
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Molecular, Protein Splicing, Trans-Splicing, Inteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review