CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 158Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of yeast-supplemented feed on Salmonella and Campylobacter populations in broilers

Open access
Line, J.E., Bailey, J.S., Cox, N.A., Stern, N.J., Tompkins, T·1998·Poultry Science
DOI 10.1093/ps/77.3.405
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The effect of the yeast, Saccharomyces boulardii, on experimental cecal colonization of broilers with Salmonella typhimurium and Campylobacter jejuni was investigated. Duplicate pens of broiler chicks were given ad libitum access to a standard feed supplemented with no yeast (control), or 1 g (1x), or 100 g (100x) dried S. boulardii/kg feed. All chicks except negative controls were challenged on Day 4 with 3.2 x 10(8) cfu S. typhimurium and 6.5 x 10(8) cfu C. jejuni by oral gavage. After 3 wk, the broilers were euthanatized and ceca were aseptically removed and analyzed for Salmonella and Campylobacter. Frequency of Salmonella colonization was significantly (P < 0.05) reduced due to yeast treatment. Of the positive control birds, 70% were colonized with Salmonella; whereas only 20 and 5% of the 1x and 100x yeast-treated birds were colonized. Mean number of Salmonella per gram of ceca and contents were log 1.64, 0.35, and 0.15, respectively, for the control, 1x, and 100x yeast-treated birds. Campylobacter colonization was not significantly affected by yeast treatment. Similar results were obtained from a second trial conducted in larger isolation floor pens.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ps/77.3.405

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In broiler chickens, there was a decreased frequency of Salmonella colonization in animals fed a yeast-supplanted diet, while the frequency of Campylobacter colonization in all animals was unaffected.

    “It was observed that there was a decreased frequency of Salmonella colonization in the animals that had been fed the yeast-supplanted diet while the frequency of colonization of Campylobacter in all animals was unaffected.”

    From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as Line et al. (1998)

  • There was no observed statistically significant change in animal weight in the study by Line et al. (1998).

    “There was also no observed statistically significant change in animal weight [51].”

    From Brewer’s Spent Yeast (BSY), an Underutilized Brewing By-Product (2020) · cites this paper as [51]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bailey, 1993, Control of Salmonella Campylobacter in poultry production, Poultry Sci., 72, 1169, 10.3382/ps.0721169 · DOI
  2. Bailey, 1988, Effect of anticoccidial and antimicrobial feed additives on prevention of Salmonella colonization of chicks treated with anaerobic cultures of chicken feces, Avian Dis., 32, 324, 10.2307/1590821 · DOI
  3. Blanchfield, 1984, Minimum intestinal inoculum for Nurmi cultures and a new method for determining competitive exclusion of Salmonella from chicks, J. Food Prot., 47, 542, 10.4315/0362-028X-47.7.542 · DOI
  4. Blehaut, 1989, Disposition kinetics of Saccharomyces boulardii in man and rat, Biopharm. Drug Disposition, 10, 353, 10.1002/bdd.2510100403 · DOI
  5. Bradley, 1994, The effects of supplementing diets with Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii on male poult performance and ileal morphology, Poultry Sci., 73, 1766, 10.3382/ps.0731766 · DOI
  6. Brugier, 1975, Antagonisme in vitro entre l'ultra-levure et different germes bacteriens, Med. Paris, 45, 61
  7. Buts, 1990, Stimulation of secretory IgA and secretory component of immunoglobulins in small intestine of rats treated with Saccharomyces boulardii, Dig. Dis. Sci., 35, 251, 10.1007/BF01536771 · DOI
  8. Castex, 1990, Prevention of Clostridium difficile-induced experimental pseudomembranous colitis by Saccharomyces boulardii: a scanning electron microscopic and microbiological study, J. Gen. Microbiol., 136, 1085, 10.1099/00221287-136-6-1085 · DOI
  9. Corthier, 1992, Effect of oral Saccharomyces boulardii treatment on the activity of Clostridium difficile toxins in mouse digestive tract, Toxicon, 30, 1583, 10.1016/0041-0101(92)90030-9 · DOI
  10. Czerucka, 1989, Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii on cholera toxin induced cAMP level in rat epithelial intestinal cell lines, Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol., 13, 383
  11. Dias, 1995, Protective effect of Saccharomyces boulardii against the cholera toxin in rats, Brazilian J. Biol. Med. Res., 28, 323
  12. Jacobs-Reitsma, 1994, Campylobacter Salmonella in broiler flocks. Intestinal carriage of Campylobacter Salmonella in Dutch broiler flocks at slaughter: a one-year study, Poultry Sci., 73, 1260, 10.3382/ps.0731260 · DOI
  13. Kollaritsch, 1993, Prevention of traveller's diarrhea with Saccharomyces boulardii. Results of a placebo-controlled double-blind study, Fortschr. Med., 111, 152
  14. Lahellec, 1985, Relationship between serotypes of salmonellae from hatcheries and rearing farms and those from processed poultry carcasses, Br. Poult. Sci., 26, 179, 10.1080/00071668508416802 · DOI
  15. Lammerding, 1988, Prevalence of Salmonella and thermophilic Campylobacter in fresh pork, beef, veal and poultry in Canada, J. Food Prot., 51, 47, 10.4315/0362-028X-51.1.47 · DOI
  16. Madrigal, 1993, Effect of an active yeast culture on performance of broilers, Poultry Sci., 72, 87
  17. Massot, 1977, Effet protecteur d'un Saccharomyces lors d'une injection bacterienne experimentale chez la Souris, Bull. Soc. Franc. Mycol. Med., 6, 45
  18. McFarland, 1993, Saccharomyces boulardii: A review of an innovative biotherapeutic agent, Microb. Ecol. Hlth. Dis., 6, 157
  19. Mirelman, 1980, Screening of bacterial isolates for mannose-specific lectin activity by agglutination of yeasts, J. Clin. Microbiol., 11, 328, 10.1128/jcm.11.4.328-331.1980 · DOI
  20. Ofek, 1977, Adherence of Escherichia coli to human mucosal cells mediated by mannose receptors, Nature, 265, 623, 10.1038/265623a0 · DOI
  21. Oyofo, 1989, Prevention of Salmonella typhimurium colonization of broilers with Dmannose, Poultry Sci., 68, 1357, 10.3382/ps.0681357 · DOI
  22. Oyofo, 1989, Inhibition by mannose of in vitro colonization of chicken small intestine by Salmonella, Poultry Sci., 68, 1351, 10.3382/ps.0681351 · DOI
  23. Rodrigues, 1996, Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii against experimental oral infection with Salmonella typhimurium Shigella flexneri in conventional and gnotobiotic mice, J. Appl. Bacteriol., 81, 251, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb04325.x · DOI
  24. Saint Marc, 1991, Efficacite de Saccharomyces boulardii dans le traitement des diarrhees du SIDA, Ann. Med. Interne, 142, 64
  25. Shanker, 1990, Horizontal transmission of Campylobacter jejuni amongst broiler chicks: experimental studies, Epidemiol. Infect., 104, 101, 10.1017/S0950268800054571 · DOI
  26. Snoeyenbos, 1968, Dynamics of Salmonella infection in chicks reared on litter, Avian Dis., 13, 72, 10.2307/1588416 · DOI
  27. Stern, 1991, Simultaneous colonization of Campylobacter jejuni Salmonella typhimurium in day-old chicks, Poultry Sci., 70, 790, 10.3382/ps.0700790 · DOI
  28. Stern, 1992, A differential-selective medium and dry-ice generated atmosphere for recovery of Campylobacter jejuni, J. Food Prot., 55, 514, 10.4315/0362-028X-55.7.514 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Line, J. E., Bailey, J. S., Cox, N. A., Stern, N. J., & Tompkins, T.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Line, J.E.
ORCID
Venue
Poultry Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-03
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
405-410
ISSN
0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1093/ps/77.3.405
OpenAlex
W2115807546
Cited by
158
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Poultry Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
Saccharomyces boulardii, yeast supplementation, broiler chickens, Salmonella typhimurium, Campylobacter jejuni, cecal colonization, probiotics, poultry feed additives
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Campylobacter Infections, Chickens, Floors and Floorcoverings, Food, Fortified, Housing, Animal, Poultry Diseases, Saccharomyces, Salmonella Infections, Animal, Salmonella typhimurium, Incidence, Campylobacter jejuni

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review