The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers
Open accessAbstract
This study attempted to evaluate the effect of various housing densities and perch availability on the immune status of commercial broilers. Birds were raised from hatch to 42 d of age with 10, 15, and 20 birds/m2 in pens, with and without the availability of horizontal perches. The immune parameters that were assessed were lymphoid organ weights, antibody response to SRBC in the last 10 d of growth, heterophil:lymphocyte ratios at 32 and 42 d of age, and lymphocyte blastogenesis of peripheral blood lymphocytes collected at 32 and 42 d of age. As density increased, bursa weight and bursa/body weight ratios decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Addition of perches to the pens also significantly decreased the bursa weights and bursa/body weight index (P < 0.01). No other significant effects were observed for the flock performance, morphometric data, or immunological tests between treatments. We concluded that under the conditions of this study, which tried to simulate commercial conditions, the bursal weight was the best indicator of stress that was related to housing density. Addition of perches appeared to increase this level of stress because the birds used the perches infrequently, and therefore there might have been a further reduction in the availability of floor space to the birds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shepherd, E. M., & Fairchild, B. D. (2010) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00770 · Cited by 458
Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals
Estevez, I., Andersen, I.-L., & Nævdal, E. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.025 · Cited by 296
Self-citationDensity Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Estevez, I. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.6.1265 · Cited by 294
Self-citationScientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders
de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevéz, I. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-295 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Heckert, R. A., Estevez, I., Russek-Cohen, E., & Pettit-Riley, R.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-457
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1988167718
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/81.4.451
- The paper
- Heckert, R. A., Estevez, I., Russek-Cohen, E., & Pettit-Riley, R. (2002). Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.4.451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.