The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Open accessAbstract
Stocking density has critical implications for the broiler industry because higher returns can be obtained as the number of birds per unit space increases. Assigned densities have been primarily driven by cost-benefit analysis, but economic profit may come at the cost of reduced bird performance, health, and welfare if densities are excessive. These negative consequences are the primary reason for the increasing demands for guidelines that limit density allowances, even through legislation. Current recommended densities are rather variable, and therefore it is critical if guidelines are to be established that they be based on sound science. Published research consistently indicates that the health and welfare of broilers is compromised if space allowances drop below 0.0625 to 0.07 m2/bird (equivalent to about 34 to 38 kg/m2 depending on final BW). Negative consequences include reduced final BW, feed intake and food conversion, and greater incidence of foot-pad dermatitis, scratches, bruising, poorer feathering, and condemnations. A few studies have also found higher mortalities, tibial dischondroplasia, and some evidence of physiological stress. At the behavioral level, most studies indicate a reduction in space use and movement and higher frequencies of disturbances, which has been linked with a higher frequency of scratches and decline in carcass quality. Other main behavioral categories remain largely unchanged. However, results overwhelmingly suggest that while stocking density has major consequences for the health and welfare of broilers, the quality of the environment, which has been largely underestimated, is far more relevant. Advances in broiler welfare will be difficult to achieve unless some criteria for environmental quality are also established. The implications of this are that the welfare of broilers can be ensured at a range of (reasonable) densities, as long as the requirements for environmental quality are fulfilled. It is also essential for industry to realize that returns per unit of space in broiler production do tend to plateau if density is excessive, a result of the reduction in bird performance. In this paper I suggest a model that may be used to maximize productivity, health, and welfare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density
Stamp Dawkins, M., Donnelly, C. A., & Jones, T. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02226 · Cited by 687
Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype
Kestin, S., Knowles, T., Tinch, A., & Gregory, N. (1992) · Veterinary Record · doi:10.1136/vr.131.9.190 · Cited by 568
Feddes, J., Emmanuel, E., & Zuidhoft, M. (2002) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/81.6.774 · Cited by 320
Effects of Age and Stocking Density on Leg Weakness in Broiler Chickens
Sørensen, P., Su, G., & Kestin, S. C. (2000) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/79.6.864 · Cited by 283
Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers
Heckert, R. A., Estevez, I., Russek-Cohen, E., & Pettit-Riley, R. (2002) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/81.4.451 · Cited by 263
Self-citationStocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers
Dozier, W. A., Thaxton, J. P., Branton, S. L., Morgan, G. W., Miles, D. M., Roush, W. B., Lott, B. D., & Vizzier-Thaxton, Y. (2005) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/84.8.1332 · Cited by 220
Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens
Ekstrand, C., Algers, B., & Svedberg, J. (1997) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0167-5877(96)01145-2 · Cited by 215
Stocking Density Effects on Male Broilers Grown to 1.8 Kilograms of Body Weight
Dozier, W. A., Thaxton, J. P., Purswell, J. L., Olanrewaju, H. A., Branton, S. L., & Roush, W. (2006) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/85.2.344 · Cited by 199
Jones, T. A., Donnelly, C. A., & Stamp Dawkins, M. (2005) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/84.8.1155 · Cited by 186
Garner, J. P., Falcone, C., Wakenell, P., Martin, M., & Mench, J. A. (2002) · British Poultry Science · doi:10.1080/00071660120103620 · Cited by 174
Cited by
Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable?
Dawkins, M. S. (2017) · Animal Production Science · doi:10.1071/an15383 · Cited by 257
Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders
de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevéz, I. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-295 · Cited by 87
Mallapur, A., Miller, C., Christman, M. C., & Estevez, I. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2008.11.005 · Cited by 21
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Estevez, I.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-06
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1265-1272
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155518023
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/86.6.1265
- The paper
- Estevez, I. (2007). Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits? Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.