The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities
Open accessAbstract
Data from a large commercial-scale experiment in which 10 major broiler producer companies stocked whole houses of birds at 30, 34, 38, 42, and 46 kg/m2 were analyzed to identify 1) temperature and humidity profiles achieved throughout the growth cycle, 2) management practices and equipment that contributed to observed variation in environmental conditions, and 3) the extent to which environmental variables affected bird welfare. The study involved a total of 2.7 million birds in 114 houses on commercial farms with measurement of a wide range of environmental and bird variables. Much of the variation in broiler health and welfare was associated with the percentage of time a company could maintain house temperature and RH within limits recommended by the breeder company. RH in the first week of life was particularly important to later health, suggesting that better control of humidity might lead to improved welfare. Key management factors affecting bird welfare were those relating to good ventilation and air control such as the type of ventilation, type of drinker, numbers of stockmen, and litter type. Controlling the environment, particularly temperature, humidity, and air and litter quality, is crucial to broiler chicken welfare. This does not mean that stocking density is unimportant, but lowering stocking density on its own, without regard to the environment the birds experience, is not sufficient. Genuine improvements in bird welfare will come from setting standards that combine stocking density, safeguards on the environment, and the genetic makeup of the birds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbiota, Gut Health and Chicken Productivity: What Is the Connection?
Diaz Carrasco, J. M., Casanova, N. A., & Fernández Miyakawa, M. E. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7100374 · Cited by 448
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Estevez, I. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.6.1265 · Cited by 294
Baéza, E., Arnould, C., Jlali, M., Chartrin, P., Gigaud, V., Mercerand, F., Durand, C., Méteau, K., Le Bihan-Duval, E., & Berri, C. (2012) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4192 · Cited by 100
Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders
de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevéz, I. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-295 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, T. A., Donnelly, C. A., & Stamp Dawkins, M.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1155-1165
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117466144
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/84.8.1155
- The paper
- Jones, T. A., Donnelly, C. A., & Stamp Dawkins, M. (2005). Environmental and management factors affecting the welfare of chickens on commercial farms in the United Kingdom and Denmark stocked at five densities. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.