The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers
Open accessAbstract
This study examined responses of male broilers during a 49-d production cycle to 4 placement densities in 2 trials. Trials were pooled because no treatment x trial interaction occurred. In each trial, 1,488 male chicks were randomly placed into 32 floor pens to simulate final densities of 30 (37 chicks/pen), 35 (43 chicks/ pen), 40 (50 chicks/pen), and 45 (56 chicks/pen) kg of BW/m2 of floor space based on a projected final BW of 3.29 kg. Growth rate and nutrient utilization were similar (P > or = 0.05) among the treatments from 1 to 32 d of age. From 1 to 49 d, BW gain (P = 0.011) and feed consumption (P = 0.029) were adversely affected by increasing the placement density from 30 to 45 kg of BW/m2 of floor space. The reduction in cumulative BW gain due to placement density can be partially explained by less feed consumption as evidenced by 95.4% of the sums of squares of BW gain being attributable to feed consumption. Litter moisture content (P = 0.025) and foot pad lesion score (P = 0.001) increased linearly with increasing placement density. Upon processing, whole carcass and breast meat yields relative to BW were not affected (P > or = 0.05) as density increased from 30 to 45 kg/m2. The proportion of whole carcasses with scratches, but not tears, on the back and thighs increased (P = 0.021) as density increased. These results indicate that increasing the density beyond 30 kg/m2 elicited some negative effects on live performance of heavy broilers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Cited by
Shepherd, E. M., & Fairchild, B. D. (2010) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00770 · Cited by 458
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Estevez, I. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.6.1265 · Cited by 294
Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders
de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevéz, I. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-295 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Dozier, W. A., Thaxton, J. P., Branton, S. L., Morgan, G. W., Miles, D. M., Roush, W. B., Lott, B. D., & Vizzier-Thaxton, Y.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1332-1338
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029099390
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/84.8.1332
- The paper
- Dozier, W. A., Thaxton, J. P., Branton, S. L., Morgan, G. W., Miles, D. M., Roush, W. B., Lott, B. D., & Vizzier-Thaxton, Y. (2005). Stocking density effects on growth performance and processing yields of heavy broilers. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.