The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stocking Density Effects on Male Broilers Grown to 1.8 Kilograms of Body Weight
Open accessAbstract
This study examined the effects of stocking density on live performance, physiological stress level indicators, and processing yields of male broilers grown to 1.8 kg. A total of 3,120 Ross x Ross 708 male chicks was placed into 32 floor pens (5.57 m2/pen). Stocking density treatments were 25, (75 birds/pen), 30 (90 birds/ pen), 35 (105 birds/pen), and 40 (120 birds/pen) kg of BW/m2. The BW gain, feed consumption, and feed conversion were adversely affected with increasing stocking densities by 35 d. Physiological stress indicators (plasma corticosterone, glucose, cholesterol, total nitrites, and heterophil:lymphocyte) were not affected. Litter moisture was higher as stocking density increased, which led to higher footpad lesion scores. In parallel to growth responses, carcass weight was depressed by increasing stocking density, but carcass yield, absolute and relative amounts of abdominal fat, and carcass skin defects were not affected. Increasing stocking density decreased breast fillet weight and its relative yield and breast tender weight, but not breast tender yield. As calculated stocking density increased 5 kg of BW/m2 beyond 25 kg of BW/ m2, final BW and breast fillet weight decreased by 41 and 12 g, respectively. We conclude that increasing stocking density beyond 30 kg of BW/m2 adversely affects growth responses and meat yield of broilers grown to 1.8 kg but does not alter physiological stress indicators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fisher, R. A. (1936) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.3923.554-a · Cited by 4,980
Cited by
Shepherd, E. M., & Fairchild, B. D. (2010) · Poultry Science · doi:10.3382/ps.2010-00770 · Cited by 458
Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Estevez, I. (2007) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/86.6.1265 · Cited by 294
Scientific report updating the EFSA opinions on the welfare of broilers and broiler breeders
de Jong, I., Berg, C., Butterworth, A., & Estevéz, I. (2012) · EFSA Supporting Publications · doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2012.en-295 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Dozier, W. A., Thaxton, J. P., Purswell, J. L., Olanrewaju, H. A., Branton, S. L., & Roush, W.
- Venue
- Poultry Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 344-351
- ISSN
- 0032-5791 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2161807414
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stocking Density Effects on Male Broilers Grown to 1.8 Kilograms of Body Weight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ps/85.2.344
- The paper
- Dozier, W. A., Thaxton, J. P., Purswell, J. L., Olanrewaju, H. A., Branton, S. L., & Roush, W. (2006). Stocking Density Effects on Male Broilers Grown to 1.8 Kilograms of Body Weight. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.344
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.