The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Measurement Properties in Patients With Knee Dysfunction
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessing disability is important, and numerous interviewer-assisted and self-report questionnaires are used to accomplish this task. These questionnaires can be classified as being generic, condition or disease specific, or patient specific. The purpose of this study was to determine test-retest reliability, construct validity, and sensitivity to change of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) when applied to patients with knee dysfunction. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 38 physician-referred patients with knee dysfunction. METHODS: The PSFS and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey were administered at a patient's initial visit and following 2 to 3 weeks of treatment. An assessment of global change was also made by the patient and clinician at follow-up. These measures allowed the assessment of construct validity and sensitivity to change. To obtain an estimate of reliability, the PSFS was also administered within 72 hours of the initial assessment. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [type 2,1] R = .84 and Pearson's r = .78, respectively). Validity was also confirmed. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: Previous investigation on persons with low back pain suggested that the PSFS has promising measurement properties. The results of this study provide further evidence supporting the reliability, validity, and efficiency of the PSFS. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent to which the PSFS can be applied across a variety of conditions and age groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rachel Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004 · Cited by 4,458
Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf01593882 · Cited by 2,206
A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient-Generated Index
Ruta, D. A., Garratt, A. M., Leng, M., Russell, I. T., & MacDonald, L. M. (1994) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199411000-00004 · Cited by 527
Cited by
Fritz, J. M., & Irrgang, J. J. (2001) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/81.2.776 · Cited by 1,045
Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: A shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia
Woby, S. R., Roach, N. K., Urmston, M., & Watson, P. J. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029 · Cited by 923
Crossley, K. M., Bennell, K. L., Cowan, S. M., & Green, S. (2004) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00613-0 · Cited by 709
Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: A randomized controlled trial
Moseley, G. L. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32 · Cited by 608
(1999) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/79.4.371 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatman, A. B., Hyams, S. P., Neel, J. M., Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Schomberg, A., & Stabler, M.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 820-829
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2115470859
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Measurement Properties in Patients With Knee Dysfunction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/77.8.820
- The paper
- Chatman, A. B., Hyams, S. P., Neel, J. M., Binkley, J. M., Stratford, P. W., Schomberg, A., & Stabler, M. (1997). The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: Measurement Properties in Patients With Knee Dysfunction. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.8.820
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.