The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliability of Measurements Obtained With the Timed “Up & Go” Test in People With Parkinson Disease
Abstract
Background and Purpose. The Timed “Up & Go” Test (TUG) is used to measure the ability of patients to perform sequential locomotor tasks that incorporate walking and turning. This study investigated the retest reliability, interrater reliability, and sensitivity of TUG scores in detecting changes in mobility in subjects with idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD). Subjects. The performance of 12 people with PD was compared with that of 12 age-matched comparison subjects without PD. Methods. The subjects with PD completed 5 trials of the TUG after withdrawal of levodopa for 12 hours (“off” phase of the medication cycle) as well as an additional 5 trials 1 hour after levodopa was administered (“on” phase of the medication cycle). They were scored on the Modified Webster Scale at both sessions. The comparison subjects also performed 5 TUG trials. All trials were videotaped and timed by 2 experienced raters. The videotape was later rated by 3 experienced clinicians and 3 inexperienced clinicians. Results. For the subjects with PD, within-session performance was highly consistent, with correlations (r) ranging from .80 to .98 for the “off” phase and from .73 to .99 for the “on” phase. The performance of the comparison subjects across the 5 trials was also highly consistent (r=.90–.97). Comparisons showed differences between trials 1 and 2 on the TUG for both groups. Removal of data for trial 1 (the practice trial) further enhanced retest reliability. There was close agreement in TUG scores among raters despite different levels of experience (intraclass correlation coefficient [3,1]=.87–.99). Mean TUG scores were different between the “on” and “off” phases of the levodopa cycle and between subjects with PD and comparison subjects during the “on” phase. Conclusion and Discussion. Retest reliability and interrater reliability of the TUG measurements were high, and the measurements reflected changes in performance according to levodopa use. The TUG can also be used to detect differences in performance between people with PD and elderly people without PD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Cited by
Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial
Nieuwboer, A., Kwakkel, G., Rochester, L., Jones, D., van Wegen, E., Willems, A. M., Chavret, F., Hetherington, V, Baker, K., & Lim, I. (2007) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.200x.097923 · Cited by 857
iTUG, a Sensitive and Reliable Measure of Mobility
Salarian, A., Horak, F. B., Zampieri, C., Carlson-Kuhta, P., Nutt, J. G., & Aminian, K. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2010.2047606 · Cited by 489
Frenkel-Toledo, S., Giladi, N., Peretz, C., Herman, T., Gruendlinger, L., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2005) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-2-23 · Cited by 285
Farris, R. J., Quintero, H. A., Murray, S. A., Ha, K. H., Hartigan, C., & Goldfarb, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2013.2268320 · Cited by 208
Weiss, A., Herman, T., Plotnik, M., Brozgol, M., Maidan, I., Giladi, N., Gurevich, T., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2010) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2009.10.015 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, S., Morris, M. E., & Iansek, R.
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 810-818
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- OpenAlex
- W2095683814
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliability of Measurements Obtained With the Timed “Up & Go” Test in People With Parkinson Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/ptj/81.2.810
- The paper
- Morris, S., Morris, M. E., & Iansek, R. (2001). Reliability of Measurements Obtained With the Timed “Up & Go” Test in People With Parkinson Disease. Physical Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/81.2.810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.