The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancing Psychologically Informed Practice for Patients With Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain: Promise, Pitfalls, and Solutions
Open accessAbstract
There has been growing interest in psychologically oriented pain management over the past 3 to 4 decades, including a 2011 description of psychologically informed practice (PIP) for low back pain. PIP requires a broader focus than traditional biomechanical and pathology-based approaches that have been traditionally used to manage musculoskeletal pain. A major focus of PIP is addressing the behavioral aspects of pain (ie, peoples’ responses to pain) by identifying individual expectations, beliefs, and feelings as prognostic factors for clinical and occupational outcomes indicating progression to chronicity. Since 2011, the interest in PIP seems to be growing, as evidenced by its use in large trials, inclusion in scientific conferences, increasing evidence base, and expansion to other musculoskeletal pain conditions. Primary care physicians and physical therapists have delivered PIP as part of a stratified care approach involving screening and targeting of treatment for people at high risk for continued pain-associated disability. Furthermore, PIP is consistent with recent national priorities emphasizing nonpharmacological pain management options. In this perspective, PIP techniques that range in complexity are described, considerations for implementation in clinical practice are offered, and future directions that will advance the understanding of PIP are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Typical components of PiPT interventions include some combination of education, cognitive-behavioral techniques for addressing coping strategies and responses to pain, and practices that influence psychophysiology such as body awareness and mindful movement.31-34”
From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The inclusion of patient centered communication (e.g. motivational interviewing) aid in supporting a healthy therapeutic alliance and self-efficacy for change.31-34”
From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Challenges to implementation and delivery of PiPT include wide variability in programs with no clear rationale or framework for inclusion, or exclusion, of specific components.22,31-34”
From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The success of delivery of PiPT and PNE has been shown to be impacted by the PT’s confidence and comfort with the program as well as the therapist having the qualities necessary to implement patient-centered care.20,28,32,35,44,52”
From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes
Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006 · Cited by 6,587
CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain—United States, 2016
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1464 · Cited by 5,161
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., Forciea, M. A., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-2367 · Cited by 3,234
The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes.
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., DONNER, A. P., McWhinney, I. R., Oates, J., Weston, W. W., & Jordan, J. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 2,508
RELIEVING PAIN IN AMERICA: A BLUEPRINT FOR TRANSFORMING PREVENTION, CARE, EDUCATION, AND RESEARCH
Simon, L. S. (2012) · Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.3109/15360288.2012.678473 · Cited by 2,200
Hill, J. C., Whitehurst, D. G., Lewis, M., Bryan, S., Dunn, K. M., Foster, N. E., Konstantinou, K., Main, C. J., Mason, E., Somerville, S., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60937-9 · Cited by 1,306
Self-citationA review of therapist characteristics and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance
Ackerman, S. J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2003) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00146-0 · Cited by 1,176
Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x · Cited by 1,085
A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment
Hill, J. C., Dunn, K. M., Lewis, M., Mullis, R., Main, C. J., Foster, N. E., & Hay, E. M. (2008) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/art.23563 · Cited by 1,052
Self-citationRelieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-6323 · Cited by 1,004
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- University of Pittsburgh, The TARGET Trial
- Australian Pain Society, The Work Injury Screening and Early Intervention (WISE) study
- Luoma, 2007, Learning ACT: An Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Skills-Training Manual for Therapists
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A critical review of the biopsychosocial model of low back pain care: time for a new approach?
Mescouto, K. A., Olson, R. E., Hodges, P. W., & Setchell, J. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1851783 · Cited by 298
Ho, E. K.-Y., Chen, L., Simic, M., Ashton-James, C. E., Comachio, J., Wang, D. X. M., Hayden, J. A., Ferreira, M. L., & Ferreira, P. H. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2021-067718 · Cited by 220
“Consistent with psychologically informed practice, an approach described more than a decade ago, 108 109 our results reinforce the clinical advantages of integrating physiotherapy care with psychological strategies or interventions.”
ResultHolopainen, R., Simpson, P., Piirainen, A., Karppinen, J., Schütze, R., Smith, A., O'Sullivan, P., & Kent, P. (2020) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001809 · Cited by 180
An Overview of Recent Developments in the Management of Burn Injuries
Radzikowska-Büchner, E., Łopuszyńska, I., Flieger, W., Tobiasz, M., Maciejewski, R., & Flieger, J. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242216357 · Cited by 214
Hoffman, H. G., Rodriguez, R. A., Gonzalez, M., Bernardy, M. K., Peña, R., Beck, W., Patterson, D. R., & Meyer, W. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00262 · Cited by 177
“Development of more powerful new non-pharmacologic pain management techniques is a national and international priority (Keefe et al., 2018), and Virtual Reality has strong potential as a new direction for behavioral medicine (Keefe et al.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Keefe, F. J., Main, C. J., & George, S. Z.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Keele University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Keefe, Francis J
- Venue
- Physical Therapy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-04-16
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 398-407
- ISSN
- 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-6724
- PMC
- PMC7207297
- OpenAlex
- W2799875742
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR055899)
- NIH
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Keywords
- chronic musculoskeletal pain, chronic pain, low back pain, pain beliefs, pain anticipation, pain-related disability, non-pharmacological pain management, stratified care, primary care, pain management
- MeSH terms
- Disability Evaluation, Humans, Pain Measurement, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Risk Assessment, Physical Therapy Modalities, Musculoskeletal Pain, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
