The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable Rare Disasters: An Exactly Solved Framework for Ten Puzzles in Macro-Finance *
Abstract
This paper incorporates a time-varying intensity of disasters in the Rietz-Barro hypothesis that risk premia result from the possibility of rare, large disasters. During a disaster, an asset's fundamental value falls by a time-varying amount. This in turn generates time-varying risk premia and thus volatile asset prices and return predictability. Using the recent technique of linearity-generating processes (Gabaix 2007), the model is tractable, and all prices are exactly solved in closed form. In the "variable rare disasters" framework, the following empirical regularities can be understood qualitatively: (i) equity premium puzzle (ii) risk-free rate-puzzle (iii) excess volatility puzzle (iv) predictability of aggregate stock market returns with price-dividend ratios (v) value premium (vi) often greater explanatory power of characteristics than covariances for asset returns (vii) upward sloping nominal yield curve (viiii) a steep yield curve predicts high bond excess returns and a fall in long term rates (ix) corporate bond spread puzzle (x) high price of deep out-of-the-money puts. I also provide a calibration in which those puzzles can be understood quantitatively as well. The fear of disaster can be interpreted literally, or can be viewed as a tractable way to model time-varying risk-aversion or investor sentiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
By Force of Habit: A Consumption‐Based Explanation of Aggregate Stock Market Behavior
Campbell, J. Y., & Cochrane, J. H. (1999) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250059 · Cited by 5,210
The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense of Return Predictability
Cochrane, J. H. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhm046 · Cited by 1,227
Cited by
Rare Disasters, Asset Prices, and Welfare Costs
Barro, R. J. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.243 · Cited by 855
BOLLERSLEV, T., & TODOROV, V. (2011) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01695.x · Cited by 804
Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction
Gabaix, X. (2016) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.30.1.185 · Cited by 435
Self-citationInvestor rewards to environmental responsibility: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis
Garel, A., & Petit-Romec, A. (2021) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101948 · Cited by 330
Koijen, R. S. J., Moskowitz, T. J., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrugt, E. B. (2018) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.11.002 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabaix, X.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-03-14
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 645-700
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2114859981
- Cited by
- 1,053
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 126.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variable Rare Disasters: An Exactly Solved Framework for Ten Puzzles in Macro-Finance *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qje/qjs001
- The paper
- Gabaix, X. (2012). Variable Rare Disasters: An Exactly Solved Framework for Ten Puzzles in Macro-Finance *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.