The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Response of Drug Expenditure to Nonlinear Contract Design: Evidence from Medicare Part D *
Open accessAbstract
We study the demand response to nonlinear price schedules using data on insurance contracts and prescription drug purchases in Medicare Part D. We exploit the kink in individuals’ budgets set created by the famous “donut hole,” where insurance becomes discontinuously much less generous on the margin, to provide descriptive evidence of the drug purchase response to a price increase. We then specify and estimate a simple dynamic model of drug use that allows us to quantify the spending response along the entire nonlinear budget set. We use the model for counterfactual analysis of the increase in spending from “filling” the donut hole, as will be required by 2020 under the Affordable Care Act. In our baseline model, which considers spending decisions within a single year, we estimate that filling the donut hole will increase annual drug spending by about $150, or about 8 percent. About one-quarter of this spending increase reflects anticipatory behavior, coming from beneficiaries whose spending prior to the policy change would leave them short of reaching the donut hole. We also present descriptive evidence of cross-year substitution of spending by individuals who reach the kink, which motivates a simple extension to our baseline model that allows—in a highly stylized way—for individuals to engage in such cross-year substitution. Our estimates from this extension suggest that a large share of the $150 drug spending increase could be attributed to cross-year substitution, and the net increase could be as little as $45 a year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Derivative-free optimization: a review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations
Rios, L. M., & Sahinidis, N. V. (2013) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-012-9951-y · Cited by 1,276
Do Taxpayers Bunch at Kink Points?
Saez, E. (2010) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.2.3.180 · Cited by 950
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts
Handel, B. R. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.7.2643 · Cited by 707
Cited by
Adverse Selection and Inertia in Health Insurance Markets: When Nudging Hurts
Handel, B. R. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.7.2643 · Cited by 707
Measuring the Sensitivity of Parameter Estimates to Estimation Moments*
Andrews, I., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2017) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjx023 · Cited by 313
Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis
Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2020) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta12675 · Cited by 285
The anticipatory effects of Medicare Part D on drug utilization
Alpert, A. (2016) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.004 · Cited by 69
Cost-sharing design matters: A comparison of the rebate and deductible in healthcare
Remmerswaal, M., Boone, J., Bijlsma, M., & Douven, R. (2019) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.01.008 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Einav, L., Finkelstein, A., & Schrimpf, P.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-08
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 841-899
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2171331269
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 53.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Response of Drug Expenditure to Nonlinear Contract Design: Evidence from Medicare Part D *. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qje/qjv005
- The paper
- Einav, L., Finkelstein, A., & Schrimpf, P. (2015). The Response of Drug Expenditure to Nonlinear Contract Design: Evidence from Medicare Part D *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.