Cited by 674Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityHistorical Economic and Social StudiesIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

“Firming Up Inequality”

Song, Jae, Price, David J, Guvenen, Fatih, Bloom, Nicholas, von Wachter, Till·2019·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We use a massive, matched employer-employee database for the United States to analyze the contribution of firms to the rise in earnings inequality from 1978 to 2013. We find that one-third of the rise in the variance of (log) earnings occurred within firms, whereas two-thirds of the rise occurred due to a rise in the dispersion of average earnings between firms. However, this rising between-firm variance is not accounted for by the firms themselves but by a widening gap between firms in the composition of their workers. This compositional change can be split into two roughly equal parts: high-wage workers became increasingly likely to work in high-wage firms (i.e., sorting increased), and high-wage workers became increasingly likely to work with each other (i.e., segregation rose). In contrast, we do not find a rise in the variance of firm-specific pay once we control for the worker composition in firms. Finally, we find that two-thirds of the rise in the within-firm variance of earnings occurred within mega (10,000+ employee) firms, which saw a particularly large increase in the variance of earnings compared with smaller firms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjy025

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fissuring of the workplace has been associated with a rising correlation of firm wage effects and person effects (skills) that accounts for a significant portion of the increase in U.S. wage inequality since 1980.

    “The fissuring of the workplace has been associated with a rising correlation of firm wage effects and person effects (skills) that accounts for a significant portion of the increase in U.S. wage inequality since 1980 (Song et al., 2019).”

    From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Song et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, J., Price, D. J., Guvenen, F., Bloom, N., & von Wachter, T.
Affiliations
  • United States Social Security Administration (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles, and National Bureau of Economic Research
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2018-10-25
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
1-50
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W2146057620
Cited by
674
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
72.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010341/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
wage inequality, worker sorting, segregation, firm size, employer-employee data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review