The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium”
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops a general theory of aggregation in inefficient economies. We provide nonparametric formulas for aggregating microeconomic shocks in economies with distortions such as taxes, markups, frictions to resource reallocation, financial frictions, and nominal rigidities. We allow for arbitrary elasticities of substitution, returns to scale, factor mobility, and input-output network linkages. We show how to separately measure changes in technical and allocative efficiency. We also show how to compute the social cost of distortions. We pursue applications focusing on firm-level markups in the United States. We find that improvement in allocative efficiency, due to the reallocation over time of market share to high-markup firms, accounts for about half of aggregate TFP growth over the period 1997–2015. We also find that eliminating the misallocation resulting from the large and dispersed markups estimated in the data would raise aggregate TFP by about 15%, increasing the economy-wide cost of monopoly distortions by two orders of magnitude compared with the famous 0.1% estimate by Harberger (1954). These exact numbers should be interpreted with care because the data are imperfect and require substantial imputation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The pattern underscores the centrality of superstar firms for the evolution of the markup consistent with the findings in de Loecker, Eeckhout, and Unger (2018) and Baqaee and Farhi (2020).”
From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Baqaee and Farhi (2020)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency
Farrell, M. J. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2343100 · Cited by 16,699
Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function
Solow, R. M. (1957) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1926047 · Cited by 12,259
The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1992) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171831 · Cited by 7,142
Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India *
Hsieh, C., & Klenow, P. J. (2009) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403 · Cited by 5,407
The Coefficient of Resource Utilization
Debreu, G. (1951) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1906814 · Cited by 2,339
Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators
Ackerberg, D. A., Caves, K. W., & Frazer, G. (2015) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta13408 · Cited by 2,229
The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications*
de Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.3386/w23687 · Cited by 2,002
Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?
Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Syverson, C. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.394 · Cited by 1,861
Claus, J. J., & Thomas, J. K. K. (2001) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00384 · Cited by 1,645
Policy distortions and aggregate productivity with heterogeneous establishments
Restuccia, D., & Rogerson, R. D. (2008) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.red.2008.05.002 · Cited by 1,626
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Autor, The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Baqaee, 2017, Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium, 10.3386/w24007 · DOI
- Hall, 1990, Solow's Productivity Residual, 71
- Hall, 1967, Tax Policy and Investment Behavior, American Economic Review, 57, 391
- Harberger, 1954, Monopoly and Resource Allocation, American Economic Association, Papers and Proceedings, 44, 77
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms*
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa004 · Cited by 2,206
The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications
De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz041 · Cited by 1,893
Supply Chain Disruptions: Evidence from the Great East Japan Earthquake*
Carvalho, V. M., Nirei, M., Saito, Y., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa044 · Cited by 960
The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications*
de Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.3386/w23687 · Cited by 2,002
The Macroeconomic Impact of Microeconomic Shocks: Beyond Hulten's Theorem
Baqaee, D., & Farhi, E. (2019) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta15202 · Cited by 537
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baqaee, D. R., & Farhi, E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Farhi, Emmanuel
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-09-24
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-163
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2765215599
- Cited by
- 648
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 28
- FWCI
- 55.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Keywords
- resource misallocation, allocative efficiency, technical efficiency, markups, total factor productivity growth, market share reallocation, factor mobility, financial frictions, nominal rigidities, tax distortions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review