Cited by 1,861Firm Innovation and GrowthEconomic Growth and ProductivityMerger and Competition Analysis

Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?

Open access
Foster, Lucia, Haltiwanger, John, Syverson, Chad·2008·American Economic Review

Abstract

We investigate the nature of selection and productivity growth in industries where we observe producer-level quantities and prices separately. We show there are important differences between revenue and physical productivity. Because physical productivity is inversely correlated with price while revenue productivity is positively correlated with price, previous work linking (revenue-based) productivity to survival confounded the separate and opposing effects of technical efficiency and demand on survival, understating the true impacts of both. Further, we find that young producers charge lower prices than incumbents. Thus the literature understates new producers' productivity advantages and entry's contribution to aggregate productivity growth. (JEL D24, L11, L25)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.98.1.394

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Production-function residuals capture not only technical efficiency differences but also market power, factor market distortions, or product mix changes.

    “These residuals capture not only differences in technical efficiency across firms but also differences in market power, factor market distortions, or changes in the product mix, as suggested by the recent work by Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, and Chad Syverson (2008), Chang-Tai Hsieh and Peter Klenow (2009), and Bernard, Stephen Redding, and Peter Schott (2010), respectively.”

    From Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms (2011) · cites this paper as Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, and Chad Syverson (2008)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Syverson, C.
Affiliations
  • United States Census Bureau (US)
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2008-03-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
394-425
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3122003031
Cited by
1,861
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 86
FWCI
195.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
Keywords
firm entry and exit, reallocation, business survival, productivity growth, technical efficiency, revenue productivity, physical productivity, new entrants, market power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review