Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability?
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the nature of selection and productivity growth in industries where we observe producer-level quantities and prices separately. We show there are important differences between revenue and physical productivity. Because physical productivity is inversely correlated with price while revenue productivity is positively correlated with price, previous work linking (revenue-based) productivity to survival confounded the separate and opposing effects of technical efficiency and demand on survival, understating the true impacts of both. Further, we find that young producers charge lower prices than incumbents. Thus the literature understates new producers' productivity advantages and entry's contribution to aggregate productivity growth. (JEL D24, L11, L25)
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Production-function residuals capture not only technical efficiency differences but also market power, factor market distortions, or product mix changes.
“These residuals capture not only differences in technical efficiency across firms but also differences in market power, factor market distortions, or changes in the product mix, as suggested by the recent work by Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, and Chad Syverson (2008), Chang-Tai Hsieh and Peter Klenow (2009), and Bernard, Stephen Redding, and Peter Schott (2010), respectively.”
From Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms (2011) · cites this paper as Lucia Foster, John Haltiwanger, and Chad Syverson (2008)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms*
Autor, D., Dorn, D., Katz, L. F., Patterson, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa004 · Cited by 2,206 · see citing works
Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju032 · Cited by 1,991 · see citing works
The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications
De Loecker, J., Eeckhout, J., & Unger, G. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz041 · Cited by 1,893 · see citing works
Bustos, P. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.1.304 · Cited by 1,552 · see citing works
Does Management Matter? Evidence from India *
Bloom, N., Eifert, B., Mahajan, A., McKenzie, D., & Roberts, J. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjs044 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation
Babina, T., Fedyk, A., He, A., & Hodson, J. (2024) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2023.103745 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence from Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings
Greenstone, M., Hornbeck, R., & Moretti, E. (2010) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/653714 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
“Productivity and Misallocation in General Equilibrium”
Baqaee, D. R., & Farhi, E. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz030 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
What Drives Differences in Management Practices?
Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, L., Jarmin, R., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Van Reenen, J. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20170491 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Self-citation“The Cyclicality of Productivity Dispersion”
Kehrig, M. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1787761 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“Changing Business Dynamism and Productivity: Shocks vs. Responsiveness”
Decker, R., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R., & Miranda, J. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w24236 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citation“The Micro-Level Anatomy of the Labor Share Decline”
Kehrig, M., & Vincent, N. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25275 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
The international empirics of management.
Scur, D., Ohlmacher, S., Van Reenen, J., Bennedsen, M., Bloom, N., Choudhary, A., Foster, L., Groenewegen, J., Grover, A., Hardeman, S., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2412205121 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Syverson, C.
- Affiliations
- United States Census Bureau (US)
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2008-03-01
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 394-425
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3122003031
- Cited by
- 1,861
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 99 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 115 · 2018: 118 · 2017: 111 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 112 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 86
- FWCI
- 195.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
- Keywords
- firm entry and exit, reallocation, business survival, productivity growth, technical efficiency, revenue productivity, physical productivity, new entrants, market power
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review