The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Central nervous system sarcoidosisdiagnosis and management
Abstract
A series of 68 patients with neurosarcoidosis is reported, with particular emphasis on clinical aspects, diagnosis and treatment. A classification system based on clinical diagnostic probability is proposed, consisting of probable and definite disease, the latter being dependent on finding sarcoid granulomas on nervous system histology, which was obtained in 12 patients (18%). The role of investigations, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), chest radiography, Kveim skin test, Gallium 67 isotope scanning and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies, is considered. Sixty-two percent of patients presented with nervous system disease, most commonly affecting the optic nerve and chiasm. Other common presentations included cranial nerve palsies, spinal cord and brainstem manifestations. Investigations yielding most diagnostic information included the Kveim test (41/48, 85% positive), raised CSF protein and/or cells (50/62, 81%) and gallium 67 scan (14/31, 45%). Eleven out of 29 patients (38%) patients showed meningeal enhancement on MRI scanning and 43% of scans demonstrated multiple white-matter lesions. Mean follow-up for the group was 4.6 years. Forty-seven patients were seen for > 18 months, and over half of these patients progressed despite corticosteroid and other immunosuppressive therapies. The benefit of a large patient database prospectively studied, with extended follow-up is discussed in order to learn more about prognosis and advance therapy in neurosarcoidosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Valeyre, D., Prasse, A., Nunes, H., Uzunhan, Y., Brillet, P.-Y., & Müller-Quernheim, J. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60680-7 · Cited by 1,087
Neurosarcoidosis: a clinical dilemma
Hoitsma, E., Faber, C. G., Drent, M., & Sharma, O. P. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00805-1 · Cited by 382
The Clinical Features of Sarcoidosis: A Comprehensive Review
Judson, M. A. (2015) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-014-8450-y · Cited by 281
Jamilloux, Y., Cohen-Aubart, F., Chapelon-Abric, C., Maucort-Boulch, D., Marquet, A., Pérard, L., Bouillet, L., Deroux, A., Abad, S., Bielefeld, P., et al. (2017) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.005 · Cited by 98
Progressive solitary sclerosis: Gradual motor impairment from a single CNS demyelinating lesion
Keegan, B. M., Kaufmann, T. J., Weinshenker, B. G., Kantarci, O. H., Schmalstieg, W. F., Paz Soldan, M. M., & Flanagan, E. P. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000003235 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Zajicek, J. P.
- Venue
- QJM
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-117
- ISSN
- 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2393
- OpenAlex
- W2337822254
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central nervous system sarcoidosisdiagnosis and management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qjmed/92.2.103
- The paper
- Zajicek, J. P. (1999). Central nervous system sarcoidosisdiagnosis and management. QJM. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/92.2.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.