Cited by 39Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPoisoning and overdose treatmentsOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Self-poisoning suicides in England: A multicentre study

Kapur, N., Turnbull, P., Hawton, K., Simkin, S., Sutton, L., Mackway-Jones, K., Bennewith, O., Gunnell, D.·2005·QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suicide by self-poisoning is an important cause of death worldwide. A substantial proportion of those with a fatal outcome may come into contact with medical services before they die. AIM: To estimate the proportion of self-poisoning suicides who reached hospital alive; to compare those who reached hospital alive with those who did not; to describe in detail the clinical characteristics and medical management of those dying in hospital. DESIGN: Retrospective audit. METHODS: We studied 24 coroners' jurisdictions across England, reviewing coroners' files and identifying all suicides by self-poisoning (drugs and other ingestible poisons) from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2001. RESULTS: Of the 214 individuals who completed suicide by self-poisoning during the study period, 49 (23%) reached hospital alive. Those reaching hospital were more likely to be female, more likely to have ingested paracetamol and less likely to have ingested co-proxamol. In the hospital sample, the commonest causes of death were respiratory (n = 10), hepatic or hepatorenal (n = 8), cardiac (n = 5), or a result of hypoxic brain injury (n = 5). Only 18% of in-hospital deaths occurred within 24 h of the overdose. DISCUSSION: Extrapolating to England as a whole, we might expect 300 self-poisoning suicides per year to reach hospital alive (6% of all suicides). Improved medical management might produce a small but significant reduction in the rate of suicide. Such interventions should not be restricted to the emergency care domain. Further research will help to clarify the likely contribution of improved medical management to suicide prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qjmed/hci089

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapur, N., Turnbull, P., Hawton, K., Simkin, S., Sutton, L., Mackway-Jones, K., Bennewith, O., & Gunnell, D.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Kapur, N.
Venue
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-06-27
Volume
98
Issue
8
Pages
589-597
ISSN
  • 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2393
  • 1460-2725
OpenAlex
W2134216651
Cited by
39
References
4
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • QJM (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
drug overdose, in-hospital mortality, paracetamol, overdose management, suicide prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Emergency Medical Services, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poisoning, Retrospective Studies, Suicide, Incidence, Hospital Mortality, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review