Cited by 62Infectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisBacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Acute central nervous system infections in adults--a retrospective cohort study in the NHS North West region

Michael, B. D., Sidhu, M., Stoeter, D., Roberts, M., Beeching, N. J., Bonington, A., Hart, I. J., Kneen, R. +3 more·2010·QJM

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last 15 years, bacterial meningitis has received considerable attention, including national guidelines, whilst viral central nervous system (CNS) infections have been relatively neglected. A recent pilot study suggested that management of patients with suspected viral encephalitis was often suboptimal. AIM: To examine the relative incidence, clinical features and management of suspected acute CNS infections in adults across the NHS North West Region. DESIGN: A multicentre cross-sectional retrospective cohort study at 10 hospitals across the region over 3 months (from September to December 2007). Following a screen of all patients who had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis or received intravenous aciclovir and/or third-generation cephalosporin, those with clinical features suspicious of a CNS infection were included. Management was compared with the national meningitis and regional encephalitis guidelines. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-five patients were screened; 217 patients had a suspected CNS infection and 44 (20%) had a CNS infection: 18 aseptic meningitis (one herpes simplex virus [HSV]-2), 13 purulent meningitis (four Streptococcus pneumoniae) and 13 encephalitis (three HSV-1). The median (range) time from admission to suspicion of CNS infection and to LP was longer for patients with encephalitis than meningitis [4 (0.3-312) vs. 0.3 (0.1-12) h, P<0.001, and 23 (4-360) vs. 12 (2-48) h, P=0.042, respectively]; and the median time to treatment was longer for aciclovir than cephalosporin [7 (0.5-312) vs. 3 (0.3-312) h, P=0.002]. DISCUSSION: Encephalitis was as common as purulent meningitis, and HSV as common as Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, the management of patients with encephalitis was worse than meningitis. National encephalitis guidelines are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qjmed/hcq121

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain imaging before lumbar puncture was a potential amendable factor associated with increased time until lumbar puncture in meningitis.

    “Consistent with other studies, we found that brain imaging before lumbar puncture was a potential amendable factor associated with increased time until lumbar puncture in meningitis.1,19,20”

    From Clinical features and prognostic factors in adults with viral meningitis. (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Investigation section reports a significantly longer time to lumbar puncture when neuro-imaging came first (median 18.5 versus 6 hours). It also reports that many patients imaged first had no contraindication to an immediate lumbar puncture, supporting the idea that this was potentially amendable. The timing comparison covers the broader CNS-infection cohort, however, not meningitis patients separately; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michael, B. D., Sidhu, M., Stoeter, D., Roberts, M., Beeching, N. J., Bonington, A., Hart, I. J., Kneen, R., Miller, A., Solomon, T., & North West Neurological Infections Network
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Venue
QJM
Published
2010-07-24
Volume
103
Issue
10
Pages
749-758
ISSN
  • 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2725
  • 1460-2393
OpenAlex
W2105189623
Cited by
62
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • QJM (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • LSTM Online Archive (Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
central nervous system infection, viral encephalitis, bacterial meningitis, aseptic meningitis, herpes simplex virus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, acyclovir, cephalosporins, clinical management, incidence, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, delayed diagnosis, treatment delay
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Central Nervous System Viral Diseases, Central Nervous System Bacterial Infections, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review