The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mephedrone use and associated adverse effects in school and college/university students before the UK legislation change
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mephedrone is a synthetic cathinone that is commonly used as a recreational drug among those who attend nightclubs. There have been increasing reports of toxicity associated with its use and it was controlled as a Class B drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act (1971) in the UK on 16 April 2010. There has been a suggestion from media reports that mephedrone use is common in children/students but there is no data on the prevalence of its use among the general population. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and frequency of use of mephedrone among school and college/university aged individuals and to collect data on the sources of mephedrone and acute harm related to its use. METHODS: Data was collected using a questionnaire survey in schools, colleges and universities in the Tayside area of Scotland, UK in February 2010. RESULTS: A total of 1006 individuals completed the survey [501 (49.8%) males and 505 (50.2%) females], of whom 349 classified their educational institute as a school and 657 as a college/university. Among them 205 (20.3%) reported previous use of mephedrone; 23.4% reported using only using mephedrone on one occasion previously, although 4.4% reported daily use. A total of 56% of those who had used mephedrone, reported at least one unwanted effect associated with its use. A total of 17.6% of users reported 'addiction or dependence' symptoms associated with their mephedrone use. A total of 48.8% of users sourced mephedrone from street level dealers, 10.7% from the Internet. CONCLUSION: We have shown in this study that the use of mephedrone among school and college/university students is common and that users found it easy to obtain. There was a high prevalence of unwanted effects associated with its use. Further work is needed to determine the impact of the recent changes in the UK legislation relating to mephedrone and other related cathinones and whether this has been effective in reducing the prevalence of mephedrone use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spiller, H. A., Ryan, M. L., Weston, R. G., & Jansen, J. (2011) · Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.3109/15563650.2011.590812 · Cited by 522
Rosenbaum, C. D., Carreiro, S. P., & Babu, K. M. (2012) · Journal of Medical Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13181-011-0202-2 · Cited by 355
Khat and synthetic cathinones: a review
Valente, M. J., Guedes de Pinho, P., de Lourdes Bastos, M., Carvalho, F., & Carvalho, M. (2014) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1163-9 · Cited by 337
New/emerging psychoactive substances and associated psychopathological consequences
Schifano, F., Napoletano, F., Chiappini, S., Guirguis, A., Corkery, J. M., Bonaccorso, S., Ricciardi, A., Scherbaum, N., & Vento, A. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719001727 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Dargan, P. I., Albert, S., & Wood, D. M.
- Venue
- QJM
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-07-30
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 875-879
- ISSN
- 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2725
- 1460-2393
- OpenAlex
- W2145815037
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mephedrone use and associated adverse effects in school and college/university students before the UK legislation change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qjmed/hcq134
- The paper
- Dargan, P. I., Albert, S., & Wood, D. M. (2010). Mephedrone use and associated adverse effects in school and college/university students before the UK legislation change. QJM. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcq134
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.