The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical experience with and analytical confirmation of “bath salts” and “legal highs” (synthetic cathinones) in the United States
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Recently, there has been a worldwide rise in the popularity and abuse of synthetic cathinones. In 2009 and 2010, a significant rise in the abuse of a new group of synthetic cathinones was reported in Western Europe. In 2010, the rapid emergence of a new drug of abuse, referred to as bath salts or "legal high," occurred in the USA. The growing number of cases along with the alarming severity of the effects caused by the abuse of these substances prompted significant concern from both healthcare providers and legal authorities. We report the experience of the first 8 months of two regional poison centers after the emergence of a new group of substances of abuse. METHOD: This was a retrospective case series of patients reported to two poison centers with exposures to bath salts. Additionally, 15 "product samples" were obtained and analyzed for drug content using GC/MS. RESULTS: There were 236 patients of which 184 (78%) were male. Age range was 16-64 years (mean 29 years, SD 9.4). All cases were intentional abuse. There were 37 separate "brand" names identified. Clinical effects were primarily neurological and cardiovascular and included: agitation (n = 194), combative behavior (n = 134), tachycardia (n = 132), hallucinations (n = 94), paranoia (n = 86), confusion (n = 83), chest pain (n = 40), myoclonus (n = 45), hypertension (n = 41), mydriasis (n = 31), CPK elevations (n = 22), hypokalemia (n = 10), and blurred vision (n = 7). Severe medical outcomes included death (n = 1), major (n = 8), and moderate (n = 130). Therapies included benzodiazepines (n = 125), antipsychotics (n = 47), and propofol (n = 10). Primary dispositions of patients were: 116 (49%) treated and released from ED, 50 (21%) admitted to critical care, 29 (12%) admitted to psych, and 28 (12%) lost to follow up. Nineteen patients had blood and/or urine analyzed using GC/MS. MDPV was detected in 13 of 17 live patients (range 24-241 ng/mL, mean 58 ng/mL). The four samples with no drug detected, reported last use of bath salts >20 h prior to presentation. Three of five patients had MDPV detected in urine (range 34-1386 ng/mL, mean 856 ng/mL). No mephedrone or methylone was detected in any sample. Quantitative analysis performed on postmortem samples detected MDPV in blood at 170 ng/mL and in urine at 1400 ng/mL. No other synthetic cathinones were detected. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of MDPV exposures with quantitative blood level confirmation. Clinical effects displayed a sympathomimetic syndrome, including psychotic episodes often requiring sedation, movement disorders, and tachycardia. Within 8 months of their appearance, 16 states had added synthetic cathinones to the controlled substances list as a Schedule I drug. CONCLUSION: We report the emergence of a new group of substances of abuse in the USA, known as bath salts, with quantitative results in 18 patients. State and federal authorities used timely information from poison centers on the bath salt outbreak during investigations to help track the extent of use and the effects occurring from these new drugs. Close collaboration between state authorities and poison centers enhanced a rapid response, including legislation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bronstein, A. C., Spyker, D. A., Cantilena, L. R., Green, J. L., Rumack, B. H., & Giffin, S. L. (2010) · Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.3109/15563650.2010.543906 · Cited by 354
The effects of non-medically used psychoactive drugs on monoamine neurotransmission in rat brain
Nagai, F., Nonaka, R., & Satoh Hisashi Kamimura, K. (2007) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.11.075 · Cited by 279
Dargan, P. I., Albert, S., & Wood, D. M. (2010) · QJM · doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcq134 · Cited by 242
Case series of individuals with analytically confirmed acute mephedrone toxicity
Wood, D. M., Davies, S., Greene, S. L., Button, J., Holt, D. W., Ramsey, J., & Dargan, P. I. (2010) · Clinical Toxicology · doi:10.3109/15563650.2010.531021 · Cited by 215
Wood, D. M., Davies, S., Puchnarewicz, M., Button, J., Archer, R., Ovaska, H., Ramsey, J., Lee, T., Holt, D. W., & Dargan, P. I. (2010) · Journal of Medical Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13181-010-0018-5 · Cited by 206
Inhibition of plasma membrane monoamine transporters by β-ketoamphetamines
Cozzi, N. V., Sievert, M. K., Shulgin, A. T., Jacob, P., & Ruoho, A. E. (1999) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00538-5 · Cited by 194
A case of extreme agitation and death after the use of mephedrone in The Netherlands
Lusthof, K. J., Oosting, R., Maes, A., Verschraagen, M., Dijkhuizen, A., & Sprong, A. G. A. (2011) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.12.014 · Cited by 190
A Parkinsonian Syndrome in Methcathinone Users and the Role of Manganese
Stepens, A., Logina, I., Liguts, V., Aldiņš, P., Ekšteina, I., Platkājis, A., Mārtiņsone, I., Tērauds, E., Rozentāle, B., & Donaghy, M. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072488 · Cited by 188
Mephedrone (4-Methylmethcathinone)-Related Deaths
Maskell, P. D., De Paoli, G., Seneviratne, C., & Pounder, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Analytical Toxicology · doi:10.1093/anatox/35.3.188 · Cited by 179
Drugs for youth via Internet and the example of mephedrone
Vardakou, I., Pistos, C., & Spiliopoulou, C. (2011) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.12.014 · Cited by 170
Cited by
Khat and synthetic cathinones: a review
Valente, M. J., Guedes de Pinho, P., de Lourdes Bastos, M., Carvalho, F., & Carvalho, M. (2014) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-013-1163-9 · Cited by 337
Murray, B. L., Murphy, C. M., & Beuhler, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Medical Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s13181-011-0196-9 · Cited by 262
Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases caused by drugs of abuse
Akasaki, Y., & Ohishi, M. (2020) · Hypertension Research · doi:10.1038/s41440-019-0367-7 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiller, H. A., Ryan, M. L., Weston, R. G., & Jansen, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 499-505
- ISSN
- 0009-9309 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3650
- 1556-9519
- OpenAlex
- W2130311417
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 73.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical experience with and analytical confirmation of “bath salts” and “legal highs” (synthetic cathinones) in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/15563650.2011.590812
- The paper
- Spiller, H. A., Ryan, M. L., Weston, R. G., & Jansen, J. (2011). Clinical experience with and analytical confirmation of “bath salts” and “legal highs” (synthetic cathinones) in the United States. Clinical Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650.2011.590812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.