Cited by 69Medication Adherence and CompliancePharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases: a survey-based study in pharmacies

Jüngst, C, Gräber, S, Simons, S, Wedemeyer, H, Lammert, F·2019·QJM: An International Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Background Poor adherence to medication leads to worsening of the disease, increased mortality and substantial rise in health care costs. Aim It was our aim to evaluate drug adherence and influencing factors in a cohort of non-selected adult pharmacy customers with various chronic diseases and following long-term treatment. Design and methods We conducted an 8 week anonymized survey in 152 German pharmacies using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale to measure medication adherence and a questionnaire comprising questions on multiple factors with potential impact on adherence. Depression was assessed applying the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Results In total, 1192 patients were included showing an overall adherence rate of 59.1%. A positive association to drug adherence was found in univariate analysis for non-smoking status, retirement, less disease related complaints, positive belief in drug effects, comprehensive knowledge about the disease and high quality of care by the physician and pharmacist. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that no or minimal depression (odds ratio (OR) 2.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.0), higher patient age (>63 years) (OR 2.2, CI 1.7-2.8), high perceived importance of the medication (OR 2.0, CI 1.5-2.6), good tolerability of the medication (OR 2.0, CI 1.2-3.5) and drug effect as expected or better (OR 1.6, CI 1.1-2.3) were positively correlated with adherence. Conclusions Suboptimal adherence to medication is common in pharmacy…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qjmed/hcz058

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jüngst, C., Gräber, S., Simons, S., Wedemeyer, H., & Lammert, F.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes (DE)
  • LINDA AG, Cologne, Germany
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Jüngst, C
Venue
QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-03-06
Volume
112
Issue
7
Pages
505-512
ISSN
  • 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2725
  • 1460-2393
OpenAlex
W2921742659
Cited by
69
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • QJM (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universitätsbibliographie, Universität Duisburg-Essen (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Liver Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
medication adherence, chronic disease, long-term treatment, depression, drug tolerability, patient knowledge of disease, quality of care, patient age, smoking status, pharmacist communication, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, PHQ-9
MeSH terms
Aged, Chronic Disease, Depression, Female, Germany, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Pharmacists, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Drug Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review