The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological Innovation and Initial Public Offerings
Open accessAbstract
This article shows how both technological and competitive risks affect the timing of private and initial public offerings in an emerging industry. Early private financing occurs in industries that are perceived to be risky, with high development costs and low probability of being displaced by technologically superior rivals. Early public financing occurs in industries perceived to be viable, with low development costs and low probability of displacement. Due to feedback effects between financial and product markets, the value of investors’ proprietary information is greater in private than in initial public offerings. This has implications for underpricing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Determinants of corporate borrowing
Myers, S. C. (1977) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(77)90015-0 · Cited by 13,169
The Long‐Run Performance of initial Public Offerings
RITTER, J. R. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x · Cited by 3,300
Why new issues are underpriced
Rock, K. (1986) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(86)90054-1 · Cited by 2,788
Insider Ownership and the Decision to Go Public
Zingales, L. (1995) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2298036 · Cited by 873
The Going‐Public Decision and the Development of Financial Markets
Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (1999) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00136 · Cited by 841
The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings
Ritter, J. R. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2328687 · Cited by 779
Innovation and Communication: Signalling with Partial Disclosure
Bhattacharya, S., & Ritter, J. R. (1983) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297419 · Cited by 721
A Theory of the Going-Public Decision
Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (1999) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/12.2.249 · Cited by 668
Anatomy of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock
Tiniç, S. M. (1988) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2328137 · Cited by 566
Anatomy of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock
Tiniç, S. M. (1988) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb02606.x · Cited by 538
Cited by
Initial Public Offerings: An Analysis of Theory and Practice
BRAU, J. C., & FAWCETT, S. E. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00840.x · Cited by 837
A Theory of the Going-Public Decision
Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (1999) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/12.2.249 · Cited by 668
The Information Content of IPO Prospectuses
Hanley, K. W., & Hoberg, G. (2010) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhq024 · Cited by 594
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.296393 · Cited by 466
Why Do Firms Use Private Equity to Opt Out of Public Markets?
Bharath, S. T., & Dittmar, A. K. (2010) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhq016 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Maksimovic, V., & Pichler, P.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 459-494
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2146329570
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 59.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technological Innovation and Initial Public Offerings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/14.2.459
- The paper
- Maksimovic, V., & Pichler, P. (2001). Technological Innovation and Initial Public Offerings. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.2.459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.