Cited by 766Banking stability, regulation, efficiencyMerger and Competition AnalysisCorporate Finance and Governance

Competition and Strategic Information Acquisition in Credit Markets

Hauswald, Robert, Marquez, Robert·2006·Review of Financial Studies

Abstract

We investigate the interaction between banks’ use of information acquisition as a strategic tool and their role in promoting the efficiency of credit markets when a bank’s ability to gather information varies with its distance to the borrower. We show that banks acquire proprietary information both to soften lending competition and to extend their market share. As competition increases, investments in information acquisition fall, leading to lower interest rates but also to less efficient lending decisions. Consistent with the recent wave of bank acquisitions, we also find that merging for informational reasons with a competitor is an optimal response to industry consolidation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/hhj021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The information hypothesis suggests an inverse relationship between bank competition and financial inclusion.

    “The information hypothesis suggests an inverse relationship between bank competition and financial inclusion.”

    From Financial inclusion, bank competition and economic growth in Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Hauswald & Marques 2006

  • Competition reduces banks' incentives to screen loan applicants ex ante because of information externalities.

    “However, competition reduces the banks' incentives to screen their loan applicants' ex ante because of information externalities (Hauswald & Marques 2006).”

    From Financial inclusion, bank competition and economic growth in Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Hauswald & Marques 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hauswald, R., & Marquez, R.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hauswald, Robert
Venue
Review of Financial Studies
Published
2006
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
967-1000
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
OpenAlex
W3123555426
Cited by
766
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 39
FWCI
56.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Financial Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
Keywords
credit markets, bank competition, bank mergers, bank acquisitions, industry consolidation, interest rates, lending efficiency, proprietary information, bank market share

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review