The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Statistical Tests and Economic Evaluation
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we provide a model-free test for asymmetric correlations which suggest stocks tend to have greater correlations with the market when the market goes down than when it goes up. We also provide such tests for asymmetric betas and covariances. In addition, we evaluate the economic significance of asymmetric correlations by answering the question that what is the utility gain for an investor who switches from a belief of symmetric stock returns into a belief of asymmetric returns. Applying our methodology to three portfolios grouped by size, Fama and French's size and book-to-market, and industry, we find that asymmetries show up in sample estimates for all the portfolios, but they are statistically ignificant primarily for small size portfolios. Nevertheless, asymmetries are of substantial economic importance for an investor who switches her symmetry belief into an asymmetric one, irrespective of the portfolios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
Cited by
Asymmetric causality tests with an application
Hatemi-J, A. (2012) · Empirical Economics · doi:10.1007/s00181-011-0484-x · Cited by 872
A review of copula models for economic time series
Patton, A. J. (2012) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2012.02.021 · Cited by 584
Multifractal analysis of financial markets: a review
Jiang, Z.-Q., Xie, W.-J., Zhou, W.-X., & Sornette, D. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ab42fb · Cited by 423
Copula Methods for Forecasting Multivariate Time Series
Patton, A. (2013) · Handbook of Economic Forecasting · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62731-5.00016-6 · Cited by 320
Principal Components as a Measure of Systemic Risk
Kritzman, M., Li, Y., Page, S., & Rigobon, R. (2011) · The Journal of Portfolio Management · doi:10.3905/jpm.2011.37.4.112 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, Y., Tu, J., & Zhou, G.
- Venue
- Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-23
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1547-1581
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2033298685
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Statistical Tests and Economic Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rfs/hhl037
- The paper
- Hong, Y., Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2007). Asymmetries in Stock Returns: Statistical Tests and Economic Evaluation. Review of Financial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhl037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.