The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, with nifedipine as treatment for primary or secondary Raynaud's phenomenon. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with primary and 27 patients with secondary Raynaud's phenomenon were assigned randomly to receive 6 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine (20 mg daily) or nifedipine (40 mg daily). Following a 2-week washout period, each group was crossed over to the other treatment arm. The primary outcome variable was the frequency of attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon. Self-reported attack severity, thermographic recovery from cold challenge and plasma levels of von Willebrand factor and soluble P-selectin were also measured. RESULTS: There was a reduction in attack frequency and severity of Raynaud's phenomenon in patients treated with either fluoxetine or nifedipine, but the effect was statistically significant only in the fluoxetine-treated group (P=0.0002 for attack severity and P=0.003 for attack frequency). Subgroup analysis showed that the greatest response was seen in females and in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon. A significant improvement in the thermographic response to cold challenge was also seen in female patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon treated with fluoxetine but not in those treated with nifedipine. There was no significant treatment effect on von Willebrand factor or soluble P-selectin. No significant adverse effects occurred in the fluoxetine-treated group. CONCLUSION: This pilot study confirms the tolerability of fluoxetine and suggests that it would be effective as a novel treatment for Raynaud's phenomenon. Larger and placebo-controlled trials are warranted to assess fluoxetine's therapeutic potential further in this vasospastic condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Update of EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis
Kowal-Bielecka, O., Fransen, J., Avouac, J., Becker, M., Kulak, A., Allanore, Y., Distler, O., Clements, P., Cutolo, M., Czirjak, L., et al. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209909 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationWigley, F. M., & Flavahan, N. A. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1507638 · Cited by 420
5-Hydroxytryptamine receptors in the human cardiovascular system
Kaumann, A. J., & Levy, F. O. (2006) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.12.004 · Cited by 309
Raynaud’s Phenomenon: A Brief Review of the Underlying Mechanisms
Fardoun, M. M., Nassif, J., Issa, K., Baydoun, E., & Eid, A. H. (2016) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2016.00438 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleiro, B., Marshall, S. E., Denton, C. P., Howell, K., Blann, A., Welsh, K. I., & Black, C. M.
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1038-1043
- ISSN
- 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-0332
- OpenAlex
- W2098559551
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/40.9.1038
- The paper
- Coleiro, B., Marshall, S. E., Denton, C. P., Howell, K., Blann, A., Welsh, K. I., & Black, C. M. (2001). Treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/40.9.1038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.