Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing remission in clinical practice

Mierau, M., Schoels, M., Gonda, G., Fuchs, J., Aletaha, D., Smolen, J. S.·2007·Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Remission constitutes the best achievable state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We aimed at evaluating sustained remission in a large cohort of patients followed prospectively in clinical practice and to evaluate available instruments to define remission for their stringency in defining this state. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed remission and sustained remission in 621 patients who had two consecutive and complete clinical observations; the average period between the two visits was 92 days (median; quartiles: 82; 105). Remission was evaluated according to modified ACR (mACR), 28 Joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria. Sustained remission was defined as remission at both consecutive visits. Patients were treated with traditional disease- modifying antirheumatic drugs, mainly methotrexate, and partly with biological agents (approximately 11%). RESULTS: Remissions at any one of the two visits were seen in 33.5% of patients by SDAI or CDAI, 42.7% by DAS28, and 38.6% by mACR criteria (P < 0.01). Sustained remission was observed in much lower proportions of patients (between 16.7 and 19.6%, dependent on the instrument). Agreement between classifications of remission by kappa-statistics was very good for SDAI vs CDAI, good for DAS28 vs SDAI or CDAI, and only moderate for mACR vs the three other scores. Residual swollen joints were observed in 15% of patients in DAS28 remission (range 1-9), 6% of patients in mACR remission (range 1-8), but only approximately 5% of patients in CDAI or SDAI remission (range 1-2) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Sustained remission can be observed in 17-20% of patients in clinical practice. CDAI and SDAI remission criteria are more stringent than DAS28 and mACR criteria, since they allow for lesser residual disease activity. Consequently, smaller proportions of patients are classified as in remission by SDAI and CDAI than by DAS28 and mACR criteria. Sustained remission is an achievable goal in clinical practice even with the most stringent of the definitions studied.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/kem007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Mierau, M., Schoels, M., Gonda, G., Fuchs, J., Aletaha, D., & Smolen, J. S.
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
2007-03-27
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
975-979
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2099321660
Cited by
200
References
1
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing remission in clinical practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/rheumatology/kem007
The paper
Mierau, M., Schoels, M., Gonda, G., Fuchs, J., Aletaha, D., & Smolen, J. S. (2007). Assessing remission in clinical practice. Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kem007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.