Identifying phenotypes of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: results from a cluster analysis in a large cohort of patients
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the aggregation of patients with aPL into different subgroups sharing common features in terms of clinical and laboratory phenotypes. Methods: We applied a hierarchical cluster analysis from the multiple correspondence analysis to determine subgroups of patients according to clinical and laboratory characteristics in a cohort of subjects with confirmed aPL positivity who presented to our outpatient clinics from 2006 to 2018. Results: A total of 486 patients [403 women; age 41.7 years (26)] were included, resulting in five clusters. Cluster 1 (n= 150) presented with thrombotic events (65.3% with venous thrombosis), with triple aPL positivity found in 34.7% of them (the highest rate among the different clusters). All the patients from cluster 2 (n = 91) had a confirmed diagnosis of SLE and the highest rate of anti-dsDNA positivity (91.7%). Cluster 3 included 79 women with pregnancy morbidity. Triple positivity was present in 3.8%, significantly lower when compared with Cluster 1 (34.7% versus 3.8%, P <0.01). Cluster 4 included 67 patients, 28 (41.8%) of whom with APS. Thrombotic events were observed in 23.9% patients. Cluster 4 had the highest rate of cytopenia, with thrombocytopenia as high 41.8% with no anti-dsDNA antibodies. Cluster 5 included 94 asymptomatic aPL carriers. Conclusion: While clusters 1, 2, 3 and 5 corresponded to well-known entities, cluster 4 might represent a bridging condition between pure primary APS and defined SLE, with lower thrombotic risk when compared with primary APS but higher general features such as ANA and cytopenia (mainly thrombocytopenia).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sciascia et al. described 94 carrier subjects, but none of them presented a triple aPL positivity.
“In a recent study, 23 Sciascia et al described 94 'carrier' subjects but none of them presented a triple aPL positivity.”
From Single or triple positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies in “carriers” or symptomatic patients: Untangling the knot (2021) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Cervera, R., Piette, J., Font, J., Khamashta, M. A., Shoenfeld, Y., Camps, M. T., Jacobsen, S., Lakos, G., Tincani, A., Kontopoulou‐Griva, I., et al. (2002) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.10187 · Cited by 2,156 · see citing works
Clinical course of high‐risk patients diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome
PENGO, V., RUFFATTI, A., LEGNANI, C., GRESELE, P., BARCELLONA, D., ERBA, N., TESTA, S., MARONGIU, F., BISON, E., DENAS, G., et al. (2010) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03674.x · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Distinctions between diagnostic and classification criteria?
Aggarwal, R., Ringold, S., Khanna, D., Neogi, T., Johnson, S. R., Miller, A., Brunner, H. I., Ogawa, R., Felson, D., Ogdie, A., et al. (2015) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.22583 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Pengo, V., Ruffatti, A., Legnani, C., Testa, S., Fierro, T., Marongiu, F., De Micheli, V., Gresele, P., Tonello, M., Ghirarduzzi, A., et al. (2011) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2011-03-340232 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bertin, D., Camoin‐Jau, L., Veit, V., Resseguier, N., Lambert, M., Buffet Delmas, P., Heim, X., Mège, J., Morange, P., & Bardin, N. (2021) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/jth.15518 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sciascia, S., Radin, M., Cecchi, I., Bertolaccini, M. L., Bertero, M. T., Rubini, E., Vaccarino, A., Bazzan, M., Giachino, O., Baldovino, S., Rossi, D., Mengozzi, G., & Roccatello, D.
- Affiliations
- Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (IT)
- Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, Cardiovascular School of Medicine & Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
- A. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Sciascia, Savino
- ORCID
- Venue
- Rheumatology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2019-12-16
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1106-1113
- ISSN
- 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-0332
- OpenAlex
- W2996744100
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Lara D. Veeken (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
- Keywords
- antiphospholipid antibodies, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, triple positivity, venous thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, cytopenia, anti-dsDNA antibodies, pregnancy morbidity, clinical phenotype
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antibodies, Antinuclear, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin M, Leukopenia, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Retrospective Studies, Thrombocytopenia, Thrombosis, Cohort Studies, Cluster Analysis, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Livedo Reticularis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review