Space radiation measurements on-board ISS—the DOSMAP experiment
Abstract
The experiment 'Dosimetric Mapping' conducted as part of the science program of NASA's Human Research Facility (HRF) between March and August 2001 was designed to measure integrated total absorbed doses (ionising radiation and neutrons), heavy ion fluxes and its energy, mass and linear energy transfer (LET) spectra, time-dependent count rates of charged particles and their corresponding dose rates at different locations inside the US Lab at the International Space Station. Owing to the variety of particles and energies, a dosimetry package consisting of thermoluminescence dosemeter (TLD) chips and nuclear track detectors with and without converters (NTDPs), a silicon dosimetry telescope (DOSTEL), four mobile silicon detector units (MDUs) and a TLD reader unit (PILLE) with 12 TLD bulbs as dosemeters was used. Dose rates of the ionising part of the radiation field measured with TLD bulbs applying the PILLE readout system at different locations varied between 153 and 231 microGy d(-1). The dose rate received by the active devices fits excellent to the TLD measurements and is significantly lower compared with measurements for the Shuttle (STS) to MIR missions. The comparison of the absorbed doses from passive and active devices showed an agreement within +/- 10%. The DOSTEL measurements in the HRF location yielded a mean dose equivalent rate of 535 microSv d(-1). DOSTEL measurements were also obtained during the Solar Particle Event on 15 April 2001.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During the DosMap mission, data was collected for GLE 60 (15 April 2001) and GLE 61 (18 April 2001).
“During the DosMap mission, data was collected for two more GLEs, namely GLE 60 (15 April 2001) and GLE 61 (18 April 2001).”
From The Solar Particle Event on 10 September 2017 as observed onboard the International Space Station (ISS) (2018) · cites this paper as Reitz et al., 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physical basis of radiation protection in space travel
Durante, M., & Cucinotta, F. A. (2011) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.83.1245 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
ICRP Publication 123: Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Astronauts in Space
Dietze, G., Bartlett, D. T., Cool, D. A., Cucinotta, F. A., Jia, X., McAulay, I. R., Pelliccioni, M., Petrov, V., Reitz, G., & Sato, T. (2013) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1016/j.icrp.2013.05.004 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Self-citationBerger, T., Burmeister, S., Matthiä, D., Przybyla, B., Reitz, G., Bilski, P., Hajek, M., Sihver, L., Szabo, J., Ambrozova, I., et al. (2017) · Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate · doi:10.1051/swsc/2017005 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationThe lunar lander neutron and dosimetry (LND) experiment on Chang'E 4
Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Yu, J., Böttcher, S. I., Zhang, S., Burmeister, S., Lohf, H., Guo, J., Xu, Z., Schuster, B., Seimetz, L., et al. (2020) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00725-3 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationStraube, U., Berger, T., Reitz, G., Facius, R., Fuglesang, C., Reiter, T., Damann, V., & Tognini, M. (2010) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.10.004 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationSlaba, T. C., Blattnig, S. R., Reddell, B., Bahadori, A., Norman, R. B., & Badavi, F. F. (2013) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2013.02.015 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Berger, T., Matthiä, D., Burmeister, S., Rios, R., Lee, K., Semones, E., Hassler, D. M., Stoffle, N., & Zeitlin, C. (2018) · Space Weather · doi:10.1029/2018sw001920 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Reitz, G., Beaujean, R., Benton, E., Burmeister, S., Dachev, T., Deme, S., Luszik-Bhadra, M., & Olko, P.
- Affiliations
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Venue
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-12-20
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 374-379
- ISSN
- 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-3406
- OpenAlex
- W2010779398
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Keywords
- space radiation, International Space Station, neutron dose, linear energy transfer spectra, thermoluminescent dosimeters, nuclear track detectors, dose rate, solar energetic particle events
- MeSH terms
- Aerospace Medicine, Cosmic Radiation, Equipment Design, Radiation Monitoring, Radiation Protection, Research, Research Design, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Occupational Exposure, Astronauts, Spacecraft, Equipment Failure Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review