Cited by 109Radiation Therapy and DosimetryRadiation Effects in ElectronicsSpaceflight effects on biology

Space radiation measurements on-board ISS—the DOSMAP experiment

Reitz, G., Beaujean, R., Benton, E., Burmeister, S., Dachev, Ts., Deme, S., Luszik-Bhadra, M., Olko, P.·2005·Radiation Protection Dosimetry

Abstract

The experiment 'Dosimetric Mapping' conducted as part of the science program of NASA's Human Research Facility (HRF) between March and August 2001 was designed to measure integrated total absorbed doses (ionising radiation and neutrons), heavy ion fluxes and its energy, mass and linear energy transfer (LET) spectra, time-dependent count rates of charged particles and their corresponding dose rates at different locations inside the US Lab at the International Space Station. Owing to the variety of particles and energies, a dosimetry package consisting of thermoluminescence dosemeter (TLD) chips and nuclear track detectors with and without converters (NTDPs), a silicon dosimetry telescope (DOSTEL), four mobile silicon detector units (MDUs) and a TLD reader unit (PILLE) with 12 TLD bulbs as dosemeters was used. Dose rates of the ionising part of the radiation field measured with TLD bulbs applying the PILLE readout system at different locations varied between 153 and 231 microGy d(-1). The dose rate received by the active devices fits excellent to the TLD measurements and is significantly lower compared with measurements for the Shuttle (STS) to MIR missions. The comparison of the absorbed doses from passive and active devices showed an agreement within +/- 10%. The DOSTEL measurements in the HRF location yielded a mean dose equivalent rate of 535 microSv d(-1). DOSTEL measurements were also obtained during the Solar Particle Event on 15 April 2001.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rpd/nci262

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reitz, G., Beaujean, R., Benton, E., Burmeister, S., Dachev, T., Deme, S., Luszik-Bhadra, M., & Olko, P.
Affiliations
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Venue
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Published
2005-12-20
Volume
116
Issue
1-4
Pages
374-379
ISSN
  • 0144-8420 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-3406
OpenAlex
W2010779398
Cited by
109
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Protection Dosimetry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • elib (German Aerospace Center) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radiation Effects in Electronics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
space radiation, International Space Station, neutron dose, linear energy transfer spectra, thermoluminescent dosimeters, nuclear track detectors, dose rate, solar energetic particle events
MeSH terms
Aerospace Medicine, Cosmic Radiation, Equipment Design, Radiation Monitoring, Radiation Protection, Research, Research Design, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Occupational Exposure, Astronauts, Spacecraft, Equipment Failure Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review