Cited by 84Action Observation and SynchronizationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

Early and late motor responses to action observation

Open access
Barchiesi, Guido, Cattaneo, Luigi·2013·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Is a short visuomotor associative training sufficient to reverse the visuomotor tuning of mirror neurons in adult humans? We tested the effects of associative training on corticospinal modulation during action observation in the 100-320 ms interval after action onset. In two separate experiments, the acceleration of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-induced movements was recorded before and after training participants to respond to observed acts with an opposite or similar behavior. Before training, TMS-induced accelerations mirrored the observed action at 250 and 320 ms. After training, responses at 250 ms were unchanged and still mirrored the stimuli, without any effect of training direction. Only at 320 ms, we observed training-dependent changes in evoked responses. A control experiment with non-biological rotational movements as visual stimuli indicated that spatial stimulus-response compatibility is not sufficient to account for the results of the two main experiments. We show that the effects of a short visuomotor associative training are not pervasive on the automatic mirror responses. 'Early' (250 ms) responses were not influenced by training. Conversely only 'late' (320 ms) responses changed according to the training direction. This biphasic time course indicates that two distinct mechanisms produce the automatic mirror responses and the newly learned visuomotor associations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nss049

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A pilot study confirmed that the stimuli and timing evoked motor resonance.

    “Although short periods of action observation have only rarely been used in the motor resonance literature (Barchiesi and Cattaneo, 2013), a pilot study confirmed that the stimuli and timing did in fact evoke motor resonance.”

    From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Barchiesi and Cattaneo, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Barrett, K.E., Barman, S.M., Boitano, S., Brooks, H.L. (2009). Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology, 23rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Medical.
  2. Brochier, T., Spinks, R.L., Umilta, M.A., Lemon, R.N. (2004). Patterns of muscle activity underlying object-specific grasp by the macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1770-82.
  3. Catmur, C., Mars, R.B., Rushworth, M.F., Heyes, C. (2011). Making mirrors: premotor cortex stimulation enhances mirror and counter-mirror motor facilitation. Journal of Cognition Neuroscience, 23, 2352-62.
  4. Cattaneo, L., Caruana, F., Jezzini, A., Rizzolatti, G. (2009). Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11134-8.
  5. Gangitano, M., Mottaghy, F.M., Pascual-Leone, A. (2004). Modulation of premotor mirror neuron activity during observation of unpredictable grasping movements. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2193-202.
  6. Ingham, D., Tucker, K.J., Tsao, H., Hodges, P.W. (2011). The effect of pain on training-induced plasticity of the corticomotor system. European Journal of Pain, 15, 1028-34.
  7. Lepage, J.F., Tremblay, S., Theoret, H. (2010). Early non-specific modulation of corticospinal excitability during action observation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 931-7.
  8. Nishitani, N., Hari, R. (2000). Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 913-8.
  9. Prabhu, G., Voss, M., Brochier, T., Cattaneo, L., Haggard, P., Lemon, R. (2007). Excitability of human motor cortex inputs prior to grasp. Journal of Physiology, 581, 189-201.
  10. Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Rizzolatti, G., Gallese, V. (2007). Numbers within our hands: modulation of corticospinal excitability of hand muscles during numerical judgment. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 684-93.
  11. Stefan, K., Classen, J., Celnik, P., Cohen, L.G. (2008). Concurrent action observation modulates practice-induced motor memory formation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 730-8.
  12. Stefan, K., Cohen, L.G., Duque, J., et al. (2005). Formation of a motor memory by action observation. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 9339-46.
  13. Weiss, E.J., Flanders, M. (2004). Muscular and postural synergies of the human hand. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 523-35.
  14. World Medical Association General Assembly (2008). Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Journal, 54, 122-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barchiesi, G., & Cattaneo, L.
Affiliations
University of Trento (IT)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2012-05-25
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
711-719
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2137557074
Cited by
84
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondazione Cassa Di Risparmio Di Trento E Rovereto
  • Provincia Autonoma di Trento
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
action observation, mirror neurons, motor response, stimulus-response compatibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Brain Mapping, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Movement, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Wrist, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Observation, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review