The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Structured Interview for Schizotypy (SIS): A Preliminary Report
Open accessAbstract
This article presents a new interview-based research instrument for assessing schizotypal symptoms and signs. The Structured Interview for Schizotypy (SIS), which was developed from experience gained in a large, controlled family study of schizophrenia in the west of Ireland and has been field-tested in three other locations, differs from previously available interviews in that it includes: (1) built-in contextual assessments of the pathological nature of certain symptoms (e.g., suspiciousness or ideas of reference); (2) multiple independently scored items, most with closed response options, per symptom scale; (3) extensive assessment of schizotypal signs; (4) symptom probes designed to make responding positively appear nondeviant; and (5) coverage of potentially relevant symptoms and signs not required in current criteria for schizotypal personality disorder. Schizotypal symptoms can be assessed with high reliability by the SIS. When sufficient variability is present, schizotypal signs are also reliably assessed by the SIS, although the reliability is generally lower than that found for symptoms. In three independent pilot studies, schizotypal symptoms and signs assessed by the SIS appear to discriminate significantly the relatives of schizophrenic patients from relatives of controls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
A Systematic Method for Clinical Description and Classification of Personality Variants: A Proposal
Cloninger, C. R. (1987) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180093014 · Cited by 3,678
Scales for physical and social anhedonia.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1976) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.85.4.374 · Cited by 1,234
Reliabilities and intercorrelations of eight measures of proneness to psychosis
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Miller, E. N. (1982) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.50.2.187 · Cited by 214
Cited by
The SPQ: A Scale for the Assessment of Schizotypal Personality Based on DSM-III-R Criteria
Raine, A. (1991) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/17.4.555 · Cited by 2,164
Kendler, K. S. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190029004 · Cited by 719
Self-citationCognitive-perceptual, interpersonal, and disorganized features of schizotypal personality
Raine, A., Reynolds, C., Lencz, T., Scerbo, A., Triphon, N., & Kim, D. (1994) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/20.1.191 · Cited by 595
Konings, M., Bak, M., Hanssen, M., Van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2006) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00741.x · Cited by 517
Evidence of a dimensional relationship between schizotypy and schizophrenia: A systematic review
Nelson, M. T., Seal, M. L., Pantelis, C., & Phillips, L. J. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.004 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendler, K. S., Lieberman, J. A., & Walsh, D.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-01-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 559-571
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- OpenAlex
- W1968190574
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Structured Interview for Schizotypy (SIS): A Preliminary Report. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/schbul/15.4.559
- The paper
- Kendler, K. S., Lieberman, J. A., & Walsh, D. (1989). The Structured Interview for Schizotypy (SIS): A Preliminary Report. Schizophrenia Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/15.4.559
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.