The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity and reliability of the CAPE: a self‐report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population
Open accessAbstract
Objective: General population longitudinal cohort studies have demonstrated the prognostic validity of self‐reported psychotic experiences, but data on reliability and cross‐validation with interview‐based measures of these experiences are sparse. This study tested the reliability and validity of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE42). Method: At baseline, the CAPE42 was used to measure the subclinical psychosis phenotype in a general population sample (n = 765). At follow‐up (mean interval: 7.7 months), the Structured Interview for Schizotypy, Revised (SIS‐R), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and the CAPE42 were administered (n = 510). Results: Baseline self‐reported dimensions of psychosis were specifically and independently associated with their equivalent interview‐based dimension at follow‐up (standardized effect sizes of 0.4–0.5) and with their equivalent self‐reported measure (standardized effect sizes of 0.6–0.8). Conclusion: The results indicate that self‐reported dimensions of psychotic experiences in general population samples appear to be stable, reliable and valid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: Definition and Reliability
Andreasen, N. C. (1982) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290070020005 · Cited by 2,247
Measurement and classification of psychiatric symptoms
Goldberg, D. (1975) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3999(75)90076-8 · Cited by 2,191
The SPQ: A Scale for the Assessment of Schizotypal Personality Based on DSM-III-R Criteria
Raine, A. (1991) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/17.4.555 · Cited by 2,164
Bijl, R. V., Ravelli, A., & van Zessen, G. (1998) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050098 · Cited by 1,216 · cited 2×
“8% of the sample, conform recent epidemiological investigations in the Netherlands, which reported a 40% lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders (37).”
BackgroundPoulton, R., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Cannon, M., Murray, R., & Harrington, H. (2000) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.11.1053 · Cited by 1,141
Body-image aberration in schizophrenia.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.87.4.399 · Cited by 989
Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., Kwapil, T. R., & Eckblad, M. (1994) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-843x.103.2.171 · Cited by 977
THE CONTINUITY OF PSYCHOTIC EXPERIENCES IN THE GENERAL POPULATION
Johns, L. C., & van Os, J. (2001) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/s0272-7358(01)00103-9 · Cited by 960
Self-citationEvidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population
STEFANIS, N. C., HANSSEN, M., SMIRNIS, N. K., AVRAMOPOULOS, D. A., EVDOKIMIDIS, I. K., STEFANIS, C. N., VERDOUX, H., & VAN OS, J. (2002) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291701005141 · Cited by 956
Self-citationStrauss (1969) revisited: a psychosis continuum in the general population?
van Os, J., Hanssen, M., Bijl, R. V., & Ravelli, A. (2000) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(99)00224-8 · Cited by 893
Self-citation
Cited by
van Os, J., Linscott, R. J., Myin-Germeys, I., Delespaul, P., & Krabbendam, L. (2009) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291708003814 · Cited by 2,343
Self-citationYung, A. R., Nelson, B., Baker, K., Buckby, J. A., Baksheev, G., & Cosgrave, E. M. (2009) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00048670802607188 · Cited by 371
Henquet, C., Rosa, A., Krabbendam, L., Papiol, S., Faňanás, L., Drukker, M., Ramaekers, J. G., & van Os, J. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301197 · Cited by 299
Self-citationMaj, M., van Os, J., De Hert, M., Gaebel, W., Galderisi, S., Green, M. F., Guloksuz, S., Harvey, P. D., Jones, P. B., Malaspina, D., et al. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20809 · Cited by 285
COUGNARD, A., MARCELIS, M., MYIN-GERMEYS, I., DE GRAAF, R., VOLLEBERGH, W., KRABBENDAM, L., LIEB, R., WITTCHEN, H.-U., HENQUET, C., SPAUWEN, J., et al. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706009731 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Konings, M., Bak, M., Hanssen, M., Van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-23
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-61
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0447
- OpenAlex
- W2002777508
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity and reliability of the CAPE: a self‐report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00741.x
- The paper
- Konings, M., Bak, M., Hanssen, M., Van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2006). Validity and reliability of the CAPE: a self‐report instrument for the measurement of psychotic experiences in the general population. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00741.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
