Cited by 24Psychological Testing and AssessmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Implementation considerations for multisite clinical trials with cognitive neuroscience tasks

Open access
Keefe, R. S. E., Harvey, P. D.·2007·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

Multisite clinical trials aimed at cognitive enhancement across various neuropsychiatric conditions have employed standard neuropsychological tests as outcome measures. While these tests have enjoyed wide clinical use and have proven reliable and predictive of functional disability, a number of implementation challenges have arisen when these tests are used in clinical trials. These issues are likely to be magnified in future studies when cognitive neuroscience (CN) procedures are explored in these trials, because in their current forms CN procedures are less standardized and more difficult to teach and monitor. For multisite trials, we anticipate that the most challenging issues will include assuring tester competence, monitoring tester performance, specific challenges with complex assessment methods, and having resources available for adequate monitoring of data quality. Suggestions for overcoming these implementation challenges are offered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbn042

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The low power of completed trials increases the likelihood of a type II statistical error of concluding that a drug with true efficacy did not have beneficial effect.

    “Our analysis shows that only one in 17 completed trials with available results had sufficient power to detect a medium (d = 0.5) effect size, thus increasing the likelihood of a type II statistical error of concluding that a drug with true efficacy did not have beneficial effect.54,55”
  • Only one in 17 completed trials with available results had sufficient power to detect a medium (d = 0.5) effect size.

    “Our analysis shows that only one in 17 completed trials with available results had sufficient power to detect a medium (d = 0.5) effect size, thus increasing the likelihood of a type II statistical error of concluding that a drug with true efficacy did not have beneficial effect.54,55”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keefe, R. S. E., & Harvey, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2007-11-21
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
656-663
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2112526545
Cited by
24
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Sanofi
  • Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
cognitive enhancement
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosciences, Psychometrics, Research, Research Design, Research Personnel, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Task Performance and Analysis, Multicenter Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review