Cited by 58Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Rare CNVs and Tag SNPs at 15q11.2 are associated with schizophrenia in the Han Chinese population

Open access
Zhao, Qian, Li, Tao, Zhao, XinZhi, Huang, Ke, Wang, Ti, Li, ZhiQiang, Ji, Jue, Zeng, Zhen +6 more·2013·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rare copy number variations (CNVs) were involved in the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders, and some of them appeared to be shared risk factors for several different diseases. One of those promising loci is the CNV at 15q11.2, including 4 genes, TUBGCP5, CYFIP1, NIPA2, and NIPA1. Several studies showed that microdeletions at this locus were significant associated with schizophrenia. In the current study, we investigated the role of both rare CNVs and common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at 15q11.2 in schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population. METHODS: We screened deletions at 15q11.2 in 2058 schizophrenia patients and 3275 normal controls in Chinese Han population by Affymetrix 500K/6.0 SNP arrays and SYBR green real-time polymerase chain reaction and then validated deletions by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and Taqman real-time assays. We successfully genotyped 27 tag SNPs in total and tested associations in 1144 schizophrenia cases and 1144 normal controls. RESULTS: We found a triple increase of deletions in cases over controls, with OR=4.45 (95% CI=1.36-14.60) and P=.014. In the analysis of common SNPs, we found that the most significant SNP in schizophrenia was rs4778334 (OR=.72, 95% CI=0.60-0.87, allelic P=.0056 after permutation, genotypic P=.015 after permutation). We also found SNP rs1009153 in CYFIP1 was associated with schizophrenia (OR=0.82, 95% CI=0.73-0.93, allelic P=.044 after permutation). CONCLUSION: We found that both rare deletions and common variants at 15q11.2 were associated with schizophrenia in the Chinese Han population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbr197

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two common SNPs in CYFIP1 are associated with schizophrenia.

    “Following the association of two common SNPs in CYFIP1 in SCZ patients110 (Table 2j), the compound heterozygous variants p.Ile476Val and p.Pro742Leu were identified via exome sequencing in two affected males from a family, who exhibited DD, ID, ASD, epilepsy, and an absence of speech (Table 2k).”

    From The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [110]

    The Associations Between Tag SNPs and Schizophrenia section reports an association for one common CYFIP1 SNP, rs1009153. Table 3 lists the other SNP that remained significant after permutation, rs4778334, between NIPA2 and NIPA1—not in CYFIP1. The claim's count of two CYFIP1 SNPs is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CYFIP1/SRA1 gene is located in a chromosomal region linked to various neurological disorders, including intellectual disability, autism, and schizophrenia.

    “The CYFIP1/SRA1 gene is located in a chromosomal region linked to various neurological disorders, including intellectual disability, autism, and schizophrenia.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Sullivan PF, Kendler KS, Neale MC. Schizophrenia as a com- plex trait: evidence from a meta-analysis of twin studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:1187-1192.
  2. Iafrate AJ, Feuk L, Rivera MN, et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2004;36:949-951.
  3. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Troge J, et al. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science. 2004;305: 525-528.
  4. Lupski JR. Structural variation in the human genome. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1169-1171.
  5. Feuk L, Carson AR, Scherer SW. Structural variation in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7:85-97.
  6. Sharp AJ, Cheng Z, Eichler EE. Structural variation of the human genome. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:407-442.
  7. Redon R, Ishikawa S, Fitch KR, et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature. 2006;444: 444-454.
  8. St Clair D. Copy number variation and schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2009;35:9-12.
  9. Kirov G, Gumus D, Chen W, et al. Comparative genome hybrid- ization suggests a role for NRXN1 and APBA2 in schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:458-465.
  10. Ousley O, Rockers K, Dell ML, Coleman K, Cubells JF. A review of neurocognitive and behavioral profiles associated with 22q11 deletion syndrome: implications for clinical evaluation and treatment. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9: 148-158.
  11. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Malhotra D, et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science. 2007;316:445-449.
  12. Stone JL, O'Donovan MC, Gurling H, et al. Rare chromosomal deletions and duplications increase risk of schizophrenia. Nature. 2008;455:237-241.
  13. Szatmari P, Paterson AD, Zwaigenbaum L, et al. Mapping autism risk loci using genetic linkage and chromosomal rear- rangements. Nat Genet. 2007;39:319-328.
  14. Walsh T, McClellan JM, McCarthy SE, et al. Rare structural variants disrupt multiple genes in neurodevelopmental path- ways in schizophrenia. Science. 2008;320:539-543.
  15. Weiss LA, Shen Y, Korn JM, et al. Association between microdeletion and microduplication at 16p11.2 and autism. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:667-675.
  16. Xu B, Roos JL, Levy S, van Rensburg EJ, Gogos JA, Karayiorgou M. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with sporadic schizophrenia. Nat Genet. 2008; 40:880-885.
  17. Stefansson H, Rujescu D, Cichon S, et al. Large recurrent microdeletions associated with schizophrenia. Nature. 2008;455:232-236.
  18. Christian SL, Robinson WP, Huang B, et al. Molecular char- acterization of two proximal deletion breakpoint regions in both Prader-Willi and Angelman syndrome patients. Am J Hum Genet. 1995;57:40-48.
  19. Amos-Landgraf JM, Ji YG, Gottlieb W, et al. Chromosome breakage in the Prader-Willi and Angelman syndromes involves recombination between large, transcribed repeats at proximal and distal breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1999; 65:370-386.
  20. Sahoo T, Peters SU, Madduri NS, et al. Microarray based comparative genomic hybridization testing in deletion bearing patients with Angelman syndrome: genotype-phenotype cor- relations. J Med Genet. 2006;43:512-516.
  21. Murthy SK, Nygren AO, El Shakankiry HM, et al. Detection of a novel familial deletion of four genes between BP1 and BP2 of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region by oligo-array CGH in a child with neurological disorder and speech impairment. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2007;116: 135-140.
  22. Kirov G, Grozeva D, Norton N, et al. Support for the in- volvement of large copy number variants in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:1497-1503.
  23. Ikeda M, Aleksic B, Kirov G, et al. Copy number variation in schizophrenia in the Japanese population. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;67:283-286.
  24. Levinson DF, Duan JB, Oh S, et al. Copy number variants in schizophrenia: confirmation of five previous findings and new evidence for 3q29 microdeletions and VIPR2 duplications. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:302-316.
  25. Shi YY, He G, Zhang Z, et al. A study of rare structural variants in schizophrenia patients and normal controls from Chinese Han population. Mol Psychiatry. 2008;13:911-913. CNVs and Tag SNPs Are Associated With Schizophrenia
  26. Schouten JP, McElgunn CJ, Waaijer R, Zwijnenburg D, Diepvens F, Pals G. Relative quantification of 40 nucleic acid sequences by multiplex ligation-dependent probe ampli- fication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e57.
  27. Nygren AO, Ameziane N, Duarte HM, et al. Methylation- specific MLPA (MS-MLPA): simultaneous detection of CpG methylation and copy number changes of up to 40 sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:e128.
  28. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:263-265.
  29. Shi YY, He L. SHEsis, a powerful software platform for anal- yses of linkage disequilibrium, haplotype construction, and ge- netic association at polymorphism loci. Cell Res. 2005;15:97-98.
  30. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559-575.
  31. Mefford HC, Cooper GM, Zerr T, et al. A method for rapid, targeted CNV genotyping identifies rare variants associated with neurocognitive disease. Genome Res. 2009;19: 1579-1585.
  32. Chai JH, Locke DP, Greally JM, et al. Identification of four highly conserved genes between breakpoint hotspots BP1 and BP2 of the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndromes dele- tion region that have undergone evolutionary transposition mediated by flanking duplicons. Am J Hum Genet. 2003; 73:898-925.
  33. Goytain A, Hines RM, Quamme GA. Functional character- ization of NIPA2, a selective Mg2+ transporter. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;295:C944-C953.
  34. Goytain A, Hines RM, El-Husseini A, Quamme GA. NIPA1(SPG6), the basis for autosomal dominant form of hereditary spastic paraplegia, encodes a functional Mg2+ transporter. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:8060-8068.
  35. Napoli I, Mercaldo V, Boyl PP, et al. The fragile X syndrome protein represses activity-dependent translat- ion through CYFIP1, a new 4E-BP. Cell. 2008;134:1042- 1054.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, Q., Li, T., Zhao, X., Huang, K., Wang, T., Li, Z., Ji, J., Zeng, Z., Zhang, Z., Li, K., Feng, G., St Clair, D., He, L., & Shi, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Shanghai Mental Health Center (CN)
Corresponding author
Shi, YongYong
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2012-02-08
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
712-719
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2154136432
Cited by
58
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA022701)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
schizophrenia, copy number variation
MeSH terms
Adult, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15, Female, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Schizophrenia, Case-Control Studies, Sequence Deletion, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Cation Transport Proteins, Asian People, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Young Adult, DNA Copy Number Variations, Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review