The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correspondence of DNA Methylation Between Blood and Brain Tissue and Its Application to Schizophrenia Research
Open accessAbstract
Given the difficulty of procuring human brain tissue, a key question in molecular psychiatry concerns the extent to which epigenetic signatures measured in more accessible tissues such as blood can serve as a surrogate marker for the brain. Here, we aimed (1) to investigate the blood-brain correspondence of DNA methylation using a within-subject design and (2) to identify changes in DNA methylation of brain-related biological pathways in schizophrenia.We obtained paired blood and temporal lobe biopsy samples simultaneously from 12 epilepsy patients during neurosurgical treatment. Using the Infinium 450K methylation array we calculated similarity of blood and brain DNA methylation for each individual separately. We applied our findings by performing gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) of peripheral blood DNA methylation data (Infinium 27K) of 111 schizophrenia patients and 122 healthy controls and included only Cytosine-phosphate-Guanine (CpG) sites that were significantly correlated across tissues.Only 7.9% of CpG sites showed a statistically significant, large correlation between blood and brain tissue, a proportion that although small was significantly greater than predicted by chance. GSEA analysis of schizophrenia data revealed altered methylation profiles in pathways related to precursor metabolites and signaling peptides.Our findings indicate that most DNA methylation markers in peripheral blood do not reliably predict brain DNA methylation status. However, a subset of peripheral data may proxy methylation status of brain tissue. Restricting the analysis to these markers can identify meaningful epigenetic differences in schizophrenia and potentially other brain disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“several studies have reported that most DNA methylation markers detected in the peripheral tissues cannot accurately predict the DNA methylation status of the brain.87”
From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases
Manolio, T. A., Collins, F. S., Cox, N. J., Goldstein, D. B., Hindorff, L. A., Hunter, D. J., McCarthy, M. I., Ramos, E. M., Cardon, L. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08494 · Cited by 8,336
Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior
Weaver, I. C. G., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A., D'Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., Dymov, S., Szyf, M., & Meaney, M. J. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1276 · Cited by 6,177
Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse
McGowan, P. O., Sasaki, A., D'Alessio, A. C., Dymov, S., Labonté, B., Szyf, M., Turecki, G., & Meaney, M. J. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2270 · Cited by 3,531
DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics
Suzuki, M. M., & Bird, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2341 · Cited by 3,039
Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs
Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2711 · Cited by 2,263
Irizarry, R. A., Ladd-Acosta, C., Wen, B., Wu, Z., Montano, C., Onyango, P., Cui, H., Gabo, K., Rongione, M., Webster, M., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.298 · Cited by 2,177
Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation
Waterland, R. A., & Jirtle, R. L. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.15.5293-5300.2003 · Cited by 2,019
Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms
Andreasen, N. C. (1982) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t12696-000 · Cited by 1,888
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- First M Spitzer A Gibbon M Williams J. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Nonpatient Edition. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute; 2002.
- Andreasen NC. Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. Iowa City: University Iowa Press; 1984.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Braun, P. R., Han, S., Hing, B., Nagahama, Y., Gaul, L. N., Heinzman, J. T., Grossbach, A. J., Close, L., Dlouhy, B. J., Howard, M. A., et al. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0376-y · Cited by 467
BECon: a tool for interpreting DNA methylation findings from blood in the context of brain
Edgar, R. D., Jones, M. J., Meaney, M. J., Turecki, G., & Kobor, M. S. (2017) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2017.171 · Cited by 261
The Science Behind the Academy for Eating Disorders' Nine Truths About Eating Disorders
Schaumberg, K., Welch, E., Breithaupt, L. E., Hübel, C., Baker, J. H., Munn‐Chernoff, M. A., Yılmaz, Z., Ehrlich, S., Mustelin, L., Ghaderi, A., et al. (2017) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2553 · Cited by 301
Self-citationYuan, M., Yang, B., Rothschild, G., Mann, J. J., Sanford, L. D., Tang, X., Huang, C., Wang, C., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01519-z · Cited by 246
“87 The latest advancements in array techniques enabled the use of hypothesis-free paradigms to examine the association of DNA methylation changes across the entire genome to study different phenotypes.”
BackgroundMisiak, B., Krefft, M., Bielawski, T., Moustafa, A. A., Sasiadek, M. M., & Frydecka, D. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.015 · Cited by 222
Metadata
- Authors
- Walton, E., Hass, J., Liu, J., Roffman, J. L., Bernardoni, F., Roessner, V., Kirsch, M., Schackert, G., Calhoun, V., & Ehrlich, S.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- TransDeN Lab (DE)
- Mind Research Network (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (DE)
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ehrlich, Stefan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-06-08
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 406-414
- ISSN
- 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-1701
- PMC
- PMC4753587
- OpenAlex
- W2256732880
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 5
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- National Institutes of Health (5k08mh068540-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K08-MH068540)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103472)
- National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB000840, R01EB020407, R01EB005846, R01EB006841)
- National Center for Research Resources (U24RR021992, M01 RR025758-01, P41-RR-14075, U24RR021382, 1U24 RR021382A, UL1RR025758, P41RR014075)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- DNA methylation
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Humans, Schizophrenia, Biomarkers, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
